Close
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sako55 View Post
    What is the breaking point for people? Really, What is it? What if the same thing happened here? What would "we" do about it?
    Don't conform. Bushmasterboy already pointed out a bunch of ways to nonviolently uphold your rights. But I also say don't conform. We know that Constitutional Case Law supports your right to own AR 15 style rifles among others. And we know that laws are passed by a specific body of people and not one person. I would also say we should express our rights through our representatives to challenge things like that.

  2. #2
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    Don't conform. Bushmasterboy already pointed out a bunch of ways to nonviolently uphold your rights. But I also say don't conform. We know that Constitutional Case Law supports your right to own AR 15 style rifles among others. And we know that laws are passed by a specific body of people and not one person. I would also say we should express our rights through our representatives to challenge things like that.
    All true, but then you get appellate court decisions like Friedman vs Highland Park or the CT/NY upheld bans.

    Friedman v Highland Park:

    " If a ban on semiautomatic guns and large-capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting, and makes the public feel safer as a result, that's a substantial benefit. Cf. Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744, 751 (7th Cir.2014)."

    CT/NY bans upheld:

    "Inthe absence of clearer guidance from the Supreme Court or stronger evidence inthe record, we follow the approach taken by the District Courts and by the D.C.Circuit in Heller II and assume for the sake of argument that these“commonly used” weapons and magazines are also “typically possessed by lawabiding citizens for lawful purposes. In short,we proceed on the assumption that these laws ban weapons protected by theSecond Amendment."

    Ban upheld anyway.

    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  3. #3
    Grand Master Know It All
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    2,986

    Default

    One of the guys I met over on the Smith-Wesson forum lives there. He said tomorrow there's supposed to be a large anti-AG rally and was planning on going. I wished him luck, hope that there's a huge turnout and told him every now and then recalls can be effective.

    Truly sad state of affairs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •