Close
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Smells Like Carp
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Widefield Colorado.
    Posts
    1,122

    Default barrel to upper receiver fit

    Have built a couple of guns and notice that some barrel extensions and uppers have different levels of tightness. Drop in, friction fit or whack it.
    Curious if there is any information about accuracy and the interface between the two parts?
    I like to coat such parts with a good anti seize paste to allow future disassembly if it matters.
    I like sex, drugs and automatic weapons. That's why i'm a dues paying member of the Libertarian party. Struggling to keep the government away from messing with the above.
    My Wife has her own vice.

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner SAnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,624

    Default

    An AR15 upper receiver drawing I have from the internet has the dimension of 1.000 + .002 inches. I pretty much trust this drawing.

    A M16 barrel extension drawing that looks like an official military spec drawing has the outside diameter where it goes into the upper receiver as .9987 -.0008 inches.

    Math makes my head hurt so I'll let you crunch the numbers.

    Just remember that there is no problem that can't be solve with a adequate application of High Explosives. Or a Big Freaking Hammer.
    Last edited by SAnd; 08-07-2016 at 02:28.
    Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless.

  3. #3
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,899

    Default

    Fits will depend on as you have discovered, variance of tolerances.
    What you have encountered is normal.
    This is part of the "Mil-Spec" shenanigans that many do not understand. Mil-Spec (dimension wise) simply means that the components as supplied fall within a given range of +- dimensions to ensure interchangeability between components of various manufacturers.
    Manufacturers matter. Higher end manufacturers such as Noveske, Black Rain, Seekins and such tend to hold the tolerance range to a tighter standard.
    Lower tier manufacturers generally accept tolerances over a wider range.
    Maintaining those tighter tolerances is one reason for higher cost.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  4. #4
    Really is Llama Not_A_Llama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    South Denver
    Posts
    992

    Default

    Zediker is a proponent of loctite for this reason. I think it helps, but have found that I need the spray-on catalyst to get a cure with stainless barrels.
    9mm - because they don't make a 9.1mm

  5. #5
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Lakewood, CO
    Posts
    340

    Default

    BPtactical, Do you guys do bluing, like a real bluing tank?

  6. #6
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fmj50 View Post
    BPtactical, Do you guys do bluing, like a real bluing tank?

    Not any more
    https://www.ar-15.co/threads/158059-...tical-Services
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  7. #7
    I am my own action figure
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wheat Ridge
    Posts
    4,010
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Tight fit, better yet thermal fit, will produce the best accuracy over a loose fit all else being equal. With passivated metal, loctite does not help unless like stated in post #4, you use the activator.
    Good Shooting, MarkCO

    www.CarbonArms.us
    www.crci.org

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •