Trump voters arming themselves to the teeth

[68Charger]

Everyone's a ticking time bomb. Some wait till they're facing mounting bills for incurable cancer.

Others go off based on a lie fanned by the medias flames. Resulting in the shit we've seen in Mo and now Milwaukee.

FTMFW... I would say that the second line is 10,000+ times more likely than the 1st...
and at LEAST 20,000:1 Democrat/liberal/progressive to Conservative (not including those that LIE about being conservative)

and While I'm not predisposed to do such a thing, and I would never condone violence on unarmed persons... I'd say IF (and it's a BIG IF) a true conservative were to do such a thing- it would likely be a surgical strike to remove cancer, rather than random acts of violence that kill many innocent civilians that had no way to defend themselves.

[Great-Kazoo]

FTMFW... I would say that the second line is 10,000+ times more likely than the 1st...
and at LEAST 20,000:1 Democrat/liberal/progressive to Conservative (not including those that LIE about being conservative)

and While I'm not predisposed to do such a thing, and I would never condone violence on unarmed persons... I'd say IF (and it's a BIG IF) a true conservative were to do such a thing- it would likely be a surgical strike to remove cancer, rather than random acts of violence that kill many innocent civilians that had no way to defend themselves.

If i didn't cover the spectrum, some forum snowflake would be pm'ing the mods. Trust me.

[Irving]

If i didn't cover the spectrum, some forum snowflake would be pm'ing the mods. Trust me.

Winter is coming.

[Great-Kazoo]

Winter is coming.

Wonder if there will be enough shovels.

[TFOGGER]

Sooooo....when the next housing bubble/market bubble/government bankruptcy crisis comes (Late 2017 is my guess, based on current events), how do you think all these social warriors are going to react ?


Annnnnd GO!

[68Charger]

I take issue with the term "social warrior"... there is nothing brave nor strong about them- so they are not warriors... "social whiners" is more appropriate.

[Zundfolge]

I take issue with the term "social warrior"... there is nothing brave nor strong about them- so they are not warriors... "social whiners" is more appropriate.

That's the point though, its supposed to be a sardonic irony (like calling a real big guy "Tiny").

Social Justice Warriors are anti-social cowards seeking to inflict injustice on people.

[Martinjmpr]

I take issue with the term "social warrior"... there is nothing brave nor strong about them- so they are not warriors... "social whiners" is more appropriate.

I like the term "Cry Bullies."

[Kraven251]

Social Justice Warriors, truly took a conservative concept often found in a variety of churches that have "Social Justice" committees and twisted it...kinda like the term "Sensible Gun Safety" they are controlling the rhetoric. Which all leads back to the media doing their best/worst to antagonize the public and whip everyone into a frenzy to generate more news/revenue.

[68Charger]

That's the point though, its supposed to be a sardonic irony (like calling a real big guy "Tiny").

Social Justice Warriors are anti-social cowards seeking to inflict injustice on people.

Not over the top enough... if that's what you're going for, then "social justice warmongers" is much more appropriate.