Close
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #5
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    I believe Irving posted this story last year: http://www.radiolab.org/story/eye-sky/

    The technology exists. We as a society have to decide whether catching criminals/terrorists is worth the ever present eye of government. IMO, this is an ethical question to be made by a society with a decreasing value on ethics.

    Where and when do we have a reasonable expectation of privacy? I certainly expect that anything I do outside of my home is observable by any number of people and technologies scattered in both public and private locations. This particular technology does not prevent a crime but may assist in locating those who did commit a crime, which may in turn prevent future crimes that could be committed by those same people. The story points out a critical weakness in our current system of intelligence gathering; we do not have enough analysts to analyze the data in a timely fashion. Why have an alarm if no one is available to respond when it goes off?
    Last edited by cstone; 08-24-2016 at 12:41.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •