LOL - either way, this is all very strange!
Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
LOL - either way, this is all very strange!
No on Putin - he wants a weak person and Obama/HRC fit that bill. Trump is the last guy Putin wants in the office of President of the USA. The reason HRC said that about Putin/Trump was to project her own machinations with Putin on to Trump. The left always projects their reflection on the other team...always. Example - When a conservative is called out for being racist by a leftist it isn't because the conservative is racist, it is because the leftist is a racist and is projecting their own racism on the conservative in order to make the leftist appear non-racist.
The left is all about fiction, everything they do and say is a fiction, usually to cover for their own bad acts.
None of this is strange, this is all very normal for communists. We're just seeing communists unveil themselves in a way we haven't seen before in this country but this has all been seen in other communist countries.
^^ Yep. Liberalism is built on lies. Everything is a lie. Always has been, always will be.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
Umm.. you do realize that most of Trump's staff is currently on, or recently has been, on Putin's payroll, right? This isn't conspiracy theory, this is admitted fact. Google Paul Manafort and/or Carter Page.Originally Posted by roberth
Trump is massively Pro-Russian/Putin. The Russian (state) media is also massively pro-Trump
What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
-- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)
I'm sticking with this all being an act to suck in the Democrats who can't stand her still voting D because they think she'll be out of office inside of a year and they'll keep control of the Oval Office.
Manafort resigned from Trump's campaign on August 19 - I had to get past 4 pages of leftist drivel to find that out.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...afort-resigns/
Carter Page, who worked in Russia at U.S. investment bank Merrill Lynch, not for the country of Russia.
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-tru...crutiny-2016-8
Last edited by roberth; 09-13-2016 at 21:52.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...-sick-hillary/
Hillary Powers Through the stairs
I'm not sure it's even half funny.
Think of the possible scenarios...
1. Clinton stays in, spending the next two months defending on email/treason and health...
1a. Loses (polling is going that way as I type even suggesting she may lose the EC)
1b. Wins
2. Clinton is replaced by Sanders, elites rebel, still a big chance they lose in Nov
3. Clinton is replaced by X, Berners rebel, guarantying a loss in Nov
So one/four of those scenarios ends well for Dems. And it requires she recover in the polls WHILE having nothing new come out about the email scandals. And it requires she be able to recover from her pneumonia* well enough to make that lie seem true and debate Trump.
Now consider that Dem elite know all of this now and they've known for months (even while in the primary). Consider that Obama has declared Trump will not be president while his party pushed forward someone he knew was unelectable on multiple fronts. And yes, Obama has all the dirt on Clinton's treason and pressured Comey (via Lynch) to come up with a reason to let it slide.
What would they do? Turn over the massive amount of power consolidated in the Executive to Trump with uncertainty of control in Congress? And the next president will nominate two Supreme Court justices (at min). That's a disaster for Democrats and that is why they are so hysterical.
If scenario #2 or 3 were going to happen it would have happened on Monday. They'd want to make that decision ASAP to start introducing a new candidate and get the Dem Civil War out of the way. Right now, they have less than two months and can decide how they want to lose (defending Hillary or fighting over another nominee), intervention withstanding.
So how likely is it that the election would be postponed due to unprecedented events?
*It ain't pneumonia
An election cannot be postponed.
The word "state" means "federal"
Benghazi was caused by a YouTube video (ETA: which was used to ruin that man's life absent any trial)
Gay marriage is protected by the 14th Amendment and no longer a states' rights issue
Vets with PTSD are prohibited persons (so are SS recipients who can't manage their financial affairs)
Here's a new one: ITAR applies to domestic gun sales/gunsmiths
Etc, etc, etc (I'm sure you guys can think of more extra-legal change)
What possible penalty would there be to postponing the elections? The Supreme Court is split kicking any ties back Obama appointed Fed district judges.
What happens if a large percentage of the folks reject that and the subsequent election results? Are the risks of this equal/less than the consequences of losing the White House?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote