My grandparents actually got a refund of PMI premiums (late 60s I think). I guess very few of the Greatest Generation defaulted on their mortgages leaving a surplus in the insurance pool.
I don't think that happens anymore.
But yes, total scam.
Yes, I know the stated reasons for PMI.
But these same banks will write unsecured credit card debt into the tens of thousands risking a lot of money that may never get back. So the question is not if the bank can completely recover on defaulted debt, but how much they get from debt consumers for the privilege of loaning our own money (0% Fed rate) back to us. And after 2007/08, turns out we back all those loans anyway (not just Freddie/Fannie).
If PMI were actually an insurance product, the homeowner would own the policy and be protected from a default/short sale. But banks still ding borrowers' credit for shorts and 1099 the difference, right (reverted back for TY2015)? So the bank is forcing the consumer to purchase an insurance product that doesn't mitigate a default for the borrower.
And if PMI does pay a claim to the banks, why are the banks issuing 1099s to deduct the losses? (I've always wondered that) They shouldn't be able to deduct an insured/paid loss, but the insurance company can. So are they acting as both?
It would be more honest of the banks to just add a few basis pts to a loan with > 80% LTV. Then it would be completely tax deductible for the borrower (up to the limits on mortgage interest).




Reply With Quote
