Close
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51
  1. #21
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneGuy67 View Post
    I'm not sure what you are arguing. She may have been a trained peace officer for California. It doesn't mean she is trained in all aspects of law enforcement. She may have been given a vehicle; Colorado gives vehicles to its DOR compliance officers too. Big deal. Again, the fact she may not have been trained or have experience in DUI enforcement is a big deal and would come out for the defense. The defense would tear her up for making an arrest based upon zero experience, training or education in DUI detection or enforcement. If there is no alcohol present, then a trained Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) is called in to conduct a more thorough set of roadside maneuvers to determine if something other than alcohol may be present, especially in California, where the DRE program was started and is rigorously trained. As a former DRE officer, I can tell you that I conducted numerous investigations to assist the regular patrol officer.

    Training and experience is not immaterial. An officer does not make an arrest unless there is probable cause to make the arrest. If you don't have the experience to know that someone is impaired by alcohol or drugs, you don't make the arrest, you call someone to assist you who would. The totality of the the officers training and experience in conducting DUI investigations is the bedrock of making a probable cause arrest for impairment. And frankly, attacking the experience and the probable cause is the first thing all defense attorney's do.
    I was thinking a lot of this as well... I hope the defense tears this whole house of cards apart. Shocking that there was a deputy DA that would actually prosecute the case... then again, it is CA.

    I know that I've come into work on 2 cups of coffee and then later downed a monster. Should I have not been on duty that day? Caffeine isn't exactly an intoxicant.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  2. #22
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Trust me, you don't want that. If California breaks away, they will look like Venezuela in just a few months and then all the zombies will be literally invading the US to get away. If we're going to build a wall, it ought to be around CA.

  3. #23
    High Power Shooter SamuraiCO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    869

    Default

    And CA can't understand why flyover country doesn't understand their stupidity.
    Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem.

    Despite what your momma told you violence does solve problems-The Craft

  4. #24
    Moderator "Doctor" Grey TheGrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Lone Tree
    Posts
    5,750

    Default

    Unbelievable.

    That's it. I'm stockpiling caffeine.
    "There is nothing in the world so permanent as a temporary emergency." - Robert A Heinlein The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

    Feedback for TheGrey

  5. #25
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneGuy67 View Post
    I'm not sure what you are arguing. She may have been a trained peace officer for California. It doesn't mean she is trained in all aspects of law enforcement. She may have been given a vehicle; Colorado gives vehicles to its DOR compliance officers too. Big deal. Again, the fact she may not have been trained or have experience in DUI enforcement is a big deal and would come out for the defense. The defense would tear her up for making an arrest based upon zero experience, training or education in DUI detection or enforcement. If there is no alcohol present, then a trained Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) is called in to conduct a more thorough set of roadside maneuvers to determine if something other than alcohol may be present, especially in California, where the DRE program was started and is rigorously trained. As a former DRE officer, I can tell you that I conducted numerous investigations to assist the regular patrol officer.

    Training and experience is not immaterial. An officer does not make an arrest unless there is probable cause to make the arrest. If you don't have the experience to know that someone is impaired by alcohol or drugs, you don't make the arrest, you call someone to assist you who would. The totality of the the officers training and experience in conducting DUI investigations is the bedrock of making a probable cause arrest for impairment. And frankly, attacking the experience and the probable cause is the first thing all defense attorney's do.
    I mentioned above there is no PC. That is important but again, probably won't come up. There are plenty of DUI cases where a person "passes" a breathalyzer or roadside and goes on to get nailed a blood draw. The reckless driving could be PC for a stop.

    My point is it's better for the defense to play a hand they can clearly win rather than one that is questionable. The absurdity of caffeine being an intoxicant and (if consumed as most do) being an impairment is where I would go rather than trying to disqualify the "agent" (the evidence does that).

    Experience set aside, an arrest was made (still can't believe it). Suspect is charged. DA isn't backing down. You seem to be saying "I wouldn't have done this" which makes since because you seem like an honest and decent LEO. I don't think that's in play here.

  6. #26
    Splays for the Bidet CS1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    6,260

    Default

    Imagine all the intoxication which will go into the preparation of both the prosecution and defense. Would be hilarious if the Prosecutor brings in coffee to drink during trial and the Defense plays on it.
    Feedback

    It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton

  7. #27
    Machine Gunner Circuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Colofornia Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,411

    Default

    If it wasn't clear before, it is now. California has gone FULL RETARD.
    "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
    NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback

  8. #28
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    I mentioned above there is no PC. That is important but again, probably won't come up. There are plenty of DUI cases where a person "passes" a breathalyzer or roadside and goes on to get nailed a blood draw. The reckless driving could be PC for a stop.

    My point is it's better for the defense to play a hand they can clearly win rather than one that is questionable. The absurdity of caffeine being an intoxicant and (if consumed as most do) being an impairment is where I would go rather than trying to disqualify the "agent" (the evidence does that).

    Experience set aside, an arrest was made (still can't believe it). Suspect is charged. DA isn't backing down. You seem to be saying "I wouldn't have done this" which makes since because you seem like an honest and decent LEO. I don't think that's in play here.

    Court doesn't work like we think it works.

  9. #29
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY
    Posts
    2,191

    Default

    If Colorado voters don't pull their heads out from between their legs this is the path Colorado will go down under democrat / progressive commie control as it already is. we're about 5 to 10 years behind "kalifonya" in regards to this statism. Coming up in the midterm elections of 2018, if the democrats get a majority in the state senate, maintain the house, and another communist or RINO gets elected for a governor, BS like this will become the norm here in this state too.

  10. #30
    Grand Master Know It All Hummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    North of Ward in Subaru County
    Posts
    2,616

    Default

    The prosecutor should not have brought charges. I looks to me the defense has a case for malicious prosecution and damages.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •