Forgive me if this has already been posted (didn't read through all 10 pages here) but my understanding is that the reason this "protest march" was so well organized was because it has been planned since last Summer. When the Dems assumed that Hillary would win in a landslide they decided to have a big "women's rally" to show their power and to celebrate the first woman president.![]()
Of course, since their annointed candidate lost, they took all that anger and frustration and turned their "celebration" into a protest. But that explains why so many people showed up - they made their plans ahead of time and the only thing that changed was the purpose of the rally.
Media attempts to spin this as some kind of miraculous, spontaneous uprising have, of course, ignored this.....
Martin
If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.
the numbers of "protestors" did not impress me, I mean after all with social media these days and that's all they could put together? Come on, back during the Vietnam war protests had crowds this big and bigger and they didn't have social media to tell them when and where to show up with a click of a button. SO for me, UNIMPRESSED.....
Laws aren't "preventable" measures. IOW, more gun laws won't stop mass shootings.
http://babylonbee.com/news/survey-10...n-not-aborted/
WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a survey conducted in the nation’s capital Saturday, a full 100% of the people marching on the nation’s capital for abortion rights as part of the “Women’s March on Washington” were found to have not been aborted by their mothers when they were yet to be born.
The controversial study indicates that there may be a connection between participating in any kind of protest, and having a mother willing to carry you to term beforehand.
“There seems to be a very strong correlation between your biological mother choosing not to end your life in the womb, and your chances of showing up to to a protest about something,” a reporter present at the march said. “I’ve interviewed hundreds of people out here today, and it’s astounding—not a single one of them was terminated when they were still in their mother’s womb.”
At publishing time, reports had discovered similar statistics at all other Women’s March events from around the globe.
Your tinfoil hat is cutting off the circulation to your brain. I am sure you can find some fake-news/opinion website to ratify your opinion, please don't bother posting the link.
We need to change the "General Discussion" sub-forum to the "General Echo-chamber" sub-forum. All I hear on this thread is "Yeah! Women are dumb and gullible! They cant even figure out that George Soros (or other liberal boogieman) secretly made them march!". Personally I give them a little more credit than that. I actually like women, some of them are even democrats...
If your post count is higher than your round count, you are a troll.
Go fuck yourself.
Does that clarify my opinion.
If your post count is higher than your round count, you are a troll.
I don't see what's so tin-foil-hatty about thinking this was planned ahead of time. After all, a lot of people - me included, BTW - assumed that Hillary would win. Given how excited people were when Obama was elected it makes perfect sense that they'd be just as excited about Hillary and want to celebrate. After Trump won, the residual anger spurred them to change the intention behind the march.
You need to point that flame gun in another direction. You're aiming at the wrong target.
Martin
If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.