Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Finally Called Dillon Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,877

    Default

    I checked the LinkedIn page of the author of the leaked white paper, and there are a couple of indicators that he may be, well, if not one of us, then at least someone who's reasonable.

    His paper has a lot of reasonable suggestions, and I suspect some of them might be either a reaction to Trump's "for every 1 new reg, delete 2", or an attempt to curry favor with the administration. That makes me somewhat hopeful that ATF would like to enter an era where they are more reasonable.

    Also, the American Suppressor Association posted a note on Facebook today that they've been meeting with ATF reps about the HPA, which seems really unprecedented. I can't think of a single time in my life when there has been an amicable meeting between a gun rights organization and ATF. So, that gives me hope as well.

    If nothing else, the best we can do is continue to call on our legislators to fix the law, and point out that even the ATF considers this fix to be a good idea.
    RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM

    If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.

    For legal reasons, that's a joke.

  2. #12
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DireWolf View Post
    I see absolutely no reason those productive endeavors couldn't be handled by the FBI, and likely in a far more effective fashion...

    BATFE should never have been allowed to exist/persist (at least as a law enforcement agency), and the new Administration has an opportunity to correct a massive wrong which has been inflicted upon American Citizens....
    If the job were transferred to the FBI, they'd have to hire additional people and would likely end up with the same people that are doing it now. I prefer to keep each federal agency as small as possible and minimize the eventual empire-building and expansion of agency "projects" that comes with increased responsibilities. IMO, keep the FBI focused on investigating threats to the country and keep the ATF focused on administering taxes on alcohol, tobacco, and firearms (which is what they were supposed to be doing) -- just reduce the ATF in size and scope so they can't self-initiate stuff like they did under Holder.

  3. #13
    Varmiteer DireWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    DENVER CO
    Posts
    713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    If the job were transferred to the FBI, they'd have to hire additional people and would likely end up with the same people that are doing it now. I prefer to keep each federal agency as small as possible and minimize the eventual empire-building and expansion of agency "projects" that comes with increased responsibilities.
    That's a very good point.




    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    ...keep the ATF focused on administering taxes on alcohol, tobacco, and firearms (which is what they were supposed to be doing) -- just reduce the ATF in size and scope so they can't self-initiate stuff like they did under Holder.
    I think this is entirely reasonable, the key being that they should become fully admin/clerical in nature, and need to engage with local LE or FBI/SS/etc. for any "field enforcement", etc...
    Last edited by DireWolf; 02-09-2017 at 13:59.

  4. #14
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    If the job were transferred to the FBI, they'd have to hire additional people and would likely end up with the same people that are doing it now. I prefer to keep each federal agency as small as possible and minimize the eventual empire-building and expansion of agency "projects" that comes with increased responsibilities. IMO, keep the FBI focused on investigating threats to the country and keep the ATF focused on administering taxes on alcohol, tobacco, and firearms (which is what they were supposed to be doing) -- just reduce the ATF in size and scope so they can't self-initiate stuff like they did under Holder.
    Good points. It would be nice to have someone arresting all those felons before they commit more crimes, though.
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  5. #15
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    Good points. It would be nice to have someone arresting all those felons before they commit more crimes, though.
    Easy ... they should act through either the local police or US Marshals when they find a violation. If we were to truly practice federalism as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, most crimes pursued by the federal government should have to be prosecuted through local authorities.

  6. #16
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,789

    Default

    I'm not holding my breath concerning reform at the ATF (or any of the alphabet monstrosities), but I'll gladly accept a reduction in regulation if it should come about. This white paper is most likely nothing, but it could be a start.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  7. #17
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    Easy ... they should act through either the local police or US Marshals when they find a violation. If we were to truly practice federalism as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, most crimes pursued by the federal government should have to be prosecuted through local authorities.
    Works for me. They'd certainly get there quicker than the feds, and who wouldn't want to arrest felons?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  8. #18
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    most crimes pursued by the federal government should have to be prosecuted through local authorities.
    Like selling marijuana?



    Oh, and as far as the BATFE being efficient, I propose we let the local DMV handle things for a while and see if anyone notices a difference.

  9. #19
    Looking Elsewhere
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Peoples Republic (Boulder)
    Posts
    3,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ah Pook View Post
    Does this have legs or just blowing more smoke?

    http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/doc...ulations/2325/
    People in government agencies write these "White Papers" all the time as part of their job. They rarely lead to actual changes. Besides, half the things mentioned in there are laws that were passed by congress of which only congress can pass a law to then change or remove them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •