Close
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35
  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Who can blame you with that article? So many words, so little truth (or info).
    No wonder the proles get all riled up... with this so called media.. its intentionally filled with half-truths or lies or both.

  2. #12
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sampson View Post
    That article was pretty weak and hard to read. The only information was at the end of the article and had to get past all the ads.

    Tragic
    Agreed. I just don't understand how journalists get jobs. It doesn't really go into any information, jumps around, is hard to read, does from arrest to a previous settlement option, the talks about what convictions could look like. Doesn't go into any detail about the incident, training, what was occurring, etc. Shoot/Don't Shoot could be a ton of different types of scenarios.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    Agreed. I just don't understand how journalists get jobs. It doesn't really go into any information, jumps around, is hard to read, does from arrest to a previous settlement option, the talks about what convictions could look like. Doesn't go into any detail about the incident, training, what was occurring, etc. Shoot/Don't Shoot could be a ton of different types of scenarios.
    Makes me think its written that way on purpose. Not incompetence. The way its written will probably make it show up as a gun crime statistic to be used later. Just my 2 cents. ..

  4. #14
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    Agreed. I just don't understand how journalists get jobs. It doesn't really go into any information, jumps around, is hard to read, does from arrest to a previous settlement option, the talks about what convictions could look like. Doesn't go into any detail about the incident, training, what was occurring, etc. Shoot/Don't Shoot could be a ton of different types of scenarios.
    Not defending today's "journalists" in any way, but many articles are now produced by bots. It costs less and fills up the page.

  5. #15
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sampson View Post
    Makes me think its written that way on purpose. Not incompetence. The way its written will probably make it show up as a gun crime statistic to be used later. Just my 2 cents. ..
    I have no doubt it will be used as a statistic. And yes I'm sure they do some of that to help support their agenda. But read any news article, it doesn't have to be gun related. There will be numerous typos, sentence structures that read poorly, an inability to get thoughts and ideas across. I feel like if you're a halfway decent writer you should be able to blow the competition out of the water.

  6. #16
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    And I apologize now for derailing the thread....please continue.

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    And I apologize now for derailing the thread....please continue.
    I think it was derailed before it even started LMAO

  8. #18
    Hello, my name is: KNOWN Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    4,617

    Default Police accidentally kill woman in training exercise

    Horrible situation for everyone involved. I'm confused on how she was shot several times though? I'm sure it was journalist exaggerating



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Gunner; 02-23-2017 at 13:08.

  9. #19
    Machine Gunner Jamnanc's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Johnstown
    Posts
    1,671

    Default

    Supppsed to be shooting blanks? What happened to the homeless people they were using as th bad guys.

    Shoot the unarmed crackhead not the librarian.
    Last edited by Jamnanc; 02-23-2017 at 14:16.

  10. #20
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    I'm relatively certain the fatal rounds were not simunitions. I could explain but the simplest answer is none of the simuntions I've used penetrate like a pistol round and full load pistol ammunition isn't all that great when it comes to killing people. Simunitions ranges are normally very strictly run to insure live ammunition isn't present, and several brands require a ramped block in the pistol to assist in feeding the weaker recoil of the sim rounds. This block is also meant to prevent the chambering of live rounds. I can't imagine anyone working on a sim range without eye protection and gloves. Simunitions are weak but they will break skin and if you are hit at close range (under 10 feet) on bare skin, you will bleed, bruise and have swelling. It hurts a lot more than any paint ball.

    My guess is that this incident was caused in the same way that many "dry fire" accidentals are caused. Complacency in checking for a loaded weapon. It only needs to happen once and your "dry fire" isn't so dry any more. Many departments have policy that prevents "dry firing" when not on a range or under the supervision of a firearms instructor because of these types of incidents.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •