Close
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Sig actually read the solicitation and submitted a system that met requirements. They also got the price per unit down to beat everyone else having learned from losing the M9 contract on price.

    Glock submitted their same old 30 year old design and ignored the specs. Because Glock is perfection so why would they change?

    Oh well.

    The P320 is a great design (frames, mags, slides all adaptable around a FCU) taking the best of the P250 and ditching the horrible trigger for a decent striker. When Sig puts out a X/M17 model (and they will) I might pick one up if it's reasonable.

  2. #2
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Glock submitted their same old 30 year old design and ignored the specs. Because Glock is perfection so why would they change?
    I'm a Glock guy through and through, I just shoot them well, but this is pretty much the tale of the tape. If you refuse to be innovative, eventually you start losing out on big contracts.

  3. #3
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Sig actually read the solicitation and submitted a system that met requirements.
    If you want something specific, you write the solicitation so that only your vendor of choice can meet those requirements.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  4. #4
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    If you want something specific, you write the solicitation so that only your vendor of choice can meet those requirements.
    Beretta tried too...

    http://www.berettadefensetechnologie...ols/apx-pistol


    ... and actually made it to the top three. This was even after the M9A3. So kudos to them for actually reading the solicitation and tooling up a new platform after having the M9A3 rejected.

    Glock has no legitimate beef.

  5. #5
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Sig actually read the solicitation and submitted a system that met requirements. They also got the price per unit down to beat everyone else having learned from losing the M9 contract on price.

    Glock submitted their same old 30 year old design and ignored the specs. Because Glock is perfection so why would they change?
    This, exactly. SIG and Beretta made changes to meet the specs. Glock just grabbed one off the shelf and sent it in. This new handgun solicitation has been around for years. SIG basically design the P320 to match the requirements.


    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    If you want something specific, you write the solicitation so that only your vendor of choice can meet those requirements.
    Maybe. But SIG did modify the P320 for the solicitation. Most notably, they added a manual safety.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •