If http://drunkcyclist.com/2017/03/28/t...etting-stompd/ is indeed the full cyclist's side of the story, then it appears to me we "have a failure to communicate" -- especially when taken with what's purported to be the runner's side of the story because they don't match and neither one seems complete. The runner's side of the story doesn't address the oncoming cyclist or his warning that someone wanted to pass and the fact that apparent witnesses seemed to come forward wanting to help the cyclist catch the runner indicates to me that others felt the runner's conduct was unwarranted.
OTOH, the cyclist's account does give an impression of a self-entitled s--t and his pictures of his injuries ...
... c'mon, really? Those abrasions along his back look like the bike frame to me -- certainly doesn't look like anyone's fist or foot. For that matter, where's the bruising that comes from the kind of beating he described? I see abrasions but I don't see the usual dark purplish bruising I would expect from fists and shoes.
At this point, I'm going to retract anything I said on the cyclist's behalf and suggest both parties need to go on "Judge Judy" and get reprimanded for acting like kids.





Reply With Quote

