Close
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Drizden
    Guest

    Default Whats the point of Waiting Periods?

    I was talking to a anti gun nut and they said the longer the wait the better the background check. Do wait periods have anything to do with background checks?

  2. #2
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Anti-anything people, generally are the least knowledgeable on the subject. Sounds like what he convinced himself of in order to accept his beliefs.


    I think the original idea behind a waiting period, was so if you were mad, you'd have time to cool down.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  3. #3
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Wait periods are pointless. If someone is intent on killing someone, or doing harm, they're going to find alternate methods if they can't get hold of a gun right away. Background checks are equally pointless because they only check on the innocent (ie responsible citizens) or stupid criminals. Real criminals get their weapons from the black market.

    What really makes me chuckle is states that have waiting periods for hand guns but not shotguns or rifles. So denying someone, with the intent to do harm, the pistol of their choice while offering them a whole array of shotguns and rifles makes sense how?

    In the end all gun control schemes have one single goal, to outlaw private gun ownership. That can be their only real intent since they offer very little in the way of crime deterrence. First they get us desensitized to 'background' checks and waiting periods, then we get receptive to registration, then restrictive licensing/permitting and before you know it we're unarmed. My 2 cents.

  4. #4
    Zombie Slayer MrPrena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    6,633

    Default

    Brandy and the gangs think that waiting period would prevent the crime.
    They think people will commit a crime as soon as they buy their firearm.
    Pick it up after the background check, and commit a crime? Just don't make sense.

  5. #5
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Proponents of the waiting period (sometimes also referred to as "cool off period") say that it prevents crimes committed "in the heat of passion" and/or suicides.

  6. #6
    Grand Master Know It All Batteriesnare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Monument Area
    Posts
    3,764

    Default

    To the best of my knowledge (and what I picked up from the good Gunny) the waiting period only pertains to new handguns, you can take as many used pistols home as you please, and can afford.
    "Owning a handgun doesn't make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician." - Col. Jeff Cooper

  7. #7
    ColoEnthusiast
    Guest

    Default

    Unfortunately waiting periods don't seem to make exception for people who have been threatened and need one for protection now, not later.

  8. #8
    smwarner
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mutt View Post
    Wait periods are pointless. If someone is intent on killing someone, or doing harm, they're going to find alternate methods if they can't get hold of a gun right away. Background checks are equally pointless because they only check on the innocent (ie responsible citizens) or stupid criminals. Real criminals get their weapons from the black market.

    What really makes me chuckle is states that have waiting periods for hand guns but not shotguns or rifles. So denying someone, with the intent to do harm, the pistol of their choice while offering them a whole array of shotguns and rifles makes sense how?

    In the end all gun control schemes have one single goal, to outlaw private gun ownership. That can be their only real intent since they offer very little in the way of crime deterrence. First they get us desensitized to 'background' checks and waiting periods, then we get receptive to registration, then restrictive licensing/permitting and before you know it we're unarmed. My 2 cents.
    I could not agree with mutt more...

    In Iowa, hand gun regulations are left up to the individual county's Sheriff's Departments. I had no trouble getting a permit to purchase, but because of the Democrat Sheriff in my county I have virtually no chance at getting a permit to carry. If I happened to live 20 miles to the south, I would be virtually guaranteed a permit. It’s just not right...




  9. #9
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Iowa isn't a "Shall issue" state then?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #10
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    692

    Default Bumper sticker.

    Gun control isn't about guns, it's about control.

    I believe that pretty much sums it up for me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •