I don't care what manufacturer it is or what the guy's wearing when he "tests" it. It fires 2 out of 3 times? That's not good.
Now, there are a few assumptions on my part. They haven't tampered with the gun or the primed cases they're using and they're doing exactly what they say they're doing with what they say they're doing it with. In other words, they're telling the truth about the way the test was performed.
Sig may have some " 'splaining to do".
ETA: And I love the way Sig says there's nothing wrong with the gun. "But we'llfixenhance it anyway."



Reply With Quote


