Close
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner Circuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Colofornia Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,411

    Default

    Yes, we all know of that regulation. It does not mean a firearm built for personal use cannot ever be sold - only that the firearm could not have been built with the initial intent of selling it.

    Build a rifle to give or sell to your buddy? Illegal.
    Build a rifle for yourself, later need some money for bills or just want to thin out the collection? Legal.
    "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
    NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback

  2. #2
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Circuits View Post
    Yes, we all know of that regulation. It does not mean a firearm built for personal use cannot ever be sold - only that the firearm could not have been built with the initial intent of selling it.

    Build a rifle to give or sell to your buddy? Illegal.
    Build a rifle for yourself, later need some money for bills or just want to thin out the collection? Legal.
    You're right...

    https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.co...her-person.htm

    The Gun Maker's Original Intent

    The key in determining whether a homemade gun can be legally sold or transferred rests with knowing the intent of the maker when the gun was first created. Relevant factors in determining the transferor’s intent may include: the length of time between the creation of the firearm and its transfer; the specific reason for the sale or transfer; and whether the maker of the firearm frequently sells or transfers homemade firearms. For example, a time lapse between creation and sale of many years, a reason for sale that has no sinister overtones, and a transfer that is one-in-a-lifetime for the transferor, would indicate an original intent to keep the gun. By contrast, quickly transferring a gun right after its creation, to someone who could not legally possess a firearm, by someone who regularly transfers such guns, would indicate a lack of intent to keep the gun.

    I personally wouldn't take this risk as the criteria is subjective and the ATF presumes we are guilty until proven innocent.

    I recall the Obama threat to prosecute over transfers (saying we are dealers by just selling a firearm). The NRA, and others asked "how many transfers does a dealer make?" They wouldn't answer. We all know why. It comes down to what they can convince a jury to believe about you.
    Always eat the vegans first

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •