Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act vote on Wednesday!

[Joe_K]

I think the important part of my post that you chose to deemphasize was the fact that I said... Or don't. This was your option before and it's still an option. But for the rest of us normal human beings that appreciate the fact that we would get some of our freedoms handed back to us by virtue of this bill I for one am happy that we now have another option that doesn't include using a straw as a deadly weapon.

If that means that I have to choose a different gun to conceal on my person and top it off with different ammo at a lower capacity then so be it. Again, this certainly beats the previous other option which was no other option at all. So you're unhappy with having to tailor your carry piece to the state you're traveling to then simply treat it the way it was before this passed and don't carry one. Don't crap in the rest of our Cheerios on this one.

I swear to God we as a community bend over backwards to give up more of our freedoms and not get more back than any other community currently having their freedoms challenged. This is why all we get is fewer freedoms and we never seem to get any back because we're all too fucking paranoid to get them back once we fight for them.

The most important part of concealed carry when in a ban state is the concealed aspect. I would never look at a state that says "No peon, you shall not do X, Y, or Z" and say "Yessah-Massa" and roll over. That said I would hope we as gun owning voters would push for rolling back of any law that infringes. That and it would be nice to not run the risk of getting made.

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[Eric P]

CA has no statewide CCW permit, so it and other states like NJ and NY you're SOL. The bill is for states that have state wide or shall issue CCW permits.
There's that whole states rights issue we rail about.

States should have zero right to regulate rights given in the constitution. I have no problem with federal control destroying local control on this. No limits on the type, size, color, features, or capacity. Same as they should have zero say on what can be printed, spoken, ect..

[spqrzilla]

Ahem

[Gman]

States should have zero right to regulate rights given in the constitution.

No rights are given in the Constitution.

[Rumline]

Otherwise I would have to carry a handgun that met CA, CO, HI, MA, MD, NY, & RI approved carry handgun roster with ball anmunition and no more than a 7 round capacity magazine inserted in order to be 50 state legal.

Just a point of clarification regarding California's roster. You can own and carry off-roster handguns, you just can't purchase them in CA. Unless you're LEO with a department letter.

[hurley842002]

Just a point of clarification regarding California's roster. You can own and carry off-roster handguns, you just can't purchase them in CA. Unless you're LEO with a department letter.

This is correct.

[roberth]

Just a point of clarification regarding California's roster. You can own and carry off-roster handguns, you just can't purchase them in CA. Unless you're LEO with a department letter.

Thank you

[lurchnp81]

This is correct.

Partly correct. Off roster handguns can only be purchased through an FFL by LEO. Off roster handguns may be sold between private parties and can also be obtained through the intra familial transfer exemptions. Parent or Grand Parent living outside of CA may gift an off roster handgun to a child/grand child...or vice versa

[Ronin13]

Unless the federal government makes a huge power grab and chooses to try to override ALL state and local firearms laws, there will always be differences that we will have to accommodate. New York and New Jersey have given the USG the finger on LEOSA provisions on many occasions, and so far have not faced any consequences.

https://www.policeone.com/retirement...ough-for-cops/

Wow! I've heard from coworkers who traveled to NYC state that there were some issues with LEOSA carry in the city and that many in NYPD act like they're better than other cops in their city. That's not the intent of LEOSA. Good to know I won't be visiting Hawaii, as that seems like a headache just to follow the law.

[CS1983]

Wow! I've heard from coworkers who traveled to NYC state that there were some issues with LEOSA carry in the city and that many in NYPD act like they're better than other cops in their city. That's not the intent of LEOSA. Good to know I won't be visiting Hawaii, as that seems like a headache just to follow the law.

Would think other cities would be more worried about NYC cops, given their penchant for hitting everyone but the criminal.