This should go well....

[Skip]

Yep, due process required.

I hope but doubt it.

I just assumed on page #1 that the Feds will get some of these entirely wrong and are not prohibited persons. Which is why we have the 72 hour rule in the first place. If the gov can't figure out a BGC result in three days, they can't very well deny someone a civil right on that basis.

[crays]

Speaking of Undocumented , based on the feds low return for rounding up and preventing illegals to enter the country. How well does anyone believe this is going to work?

But these guns are documented, silly goose. That's why the .gov hates them...

[Ronin13]

The Feds have been caught lying so many times regarding the Bundy et al trial, that the judge has started to drop charges for those involved one by one.

One FBI HRT agent even got caught messing with a crime scene where Levoy Finicum was killed by pocketing his brass and then all five HRT hotshots on scene lied to the state investigators by saying none of them fired their weapons in official reports and local police interviews.

So yeah, theres two recent examples of the Feds being "a lot more careful".

I'm not touching the Bundy Matter with a 50-foot pole. That's a mess on all sides.

Your point is well taken IMO, and I would also add that not only have the .GOV been working on what went wrong in those situations. I would also think that those of whom wish to defy .GOV have also been working on the same things. I have no problem admitting that I have spent some time running through the logistics of breach and defense thereof, among other things.

I'm one dude without that kind of training......and I really do believe that there are some groups of folks in our country that really have their sheet together, and are a lot more prepared than "authority" has anticipated or accounted for. Maybe I'm wrong, it's a gut feeling.

I can't say for the Feds, but I know what the locals go through, and I constantly hope and pray that I never get called on to go head-on against some of those groups that are prepared to face "authorities"... Let's just say it won't be pretty on either side. Going after guns held by those not legally allowed to possess them is never a good task.

[CS1983]

I can't say for the Feds, but I know what the locals go through, and I constantly hope and pray that I never get called on to go head-on against some of those groups that are prepared to face "authorities"... Let's just say it won't be pretty on either side. Going after guns held by those not legally allowed to possess them is never a good task.

Just do what we did with AQI and JAM: pay them not to fight and deputize them to take out their enemies who refused to cooperate with authorities. Win-win!