Denver Bump Stock / Binary Trigger / Mag Ban

[hurley842002]

I have a feeling it won't be long until Colorado restricts even further to a 10 round limit in order to match their sister state CA...

Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk

[Ronin13]

I have a feeling it won't be long until Colorado restricts even further to a 10 round limit in order to match their sister state CA...

Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk

I have this feeling too. Denver is awful, and the fact that they oftentimes dictate to the rest of the state is not only terrifying, it's also very disappointing.

[Eric P]

Isn't there a state law saying locals can't have more restrictive gun laws that the state. The only exception were Denver laws already in place?

Fvck Denver and this state. In am tossing a 30 rounder in the trunk out of spite.

[Great-Kazoo]

Isn't there a state law saying locals can't have more restrictive gun laws that the state. The only exception were Denver laws already in place?

Fvck Denver and this state. In am tossing a 30 rounder in the trunk out of spite.

Is that a taxpayer subsidized mag?

[Skip]

Isn't there a state law saying locals can't have more restrictive gun laws that the state. The only exception were Denver laws already in place?

Fvck Denver and this state. In am tossing a 30 rounder in the trunk out of spite.

JB Weld one to your car as a hood ornament. Let us know what happens. I'm guessing nothing just like the state mag ban.

Actual enforcement would snare too many professional dim voters.

[kidicarus13]

UPDATE:

An ordinance banning bump stock firing mechanisms passed Denver’s SAFEHOUSE committee Wednesday (Jan 3) and will now go before the full Denver City Council.

The initial hearing before the Denver City Council will be Jan. 16. The second hearing is scheduled for Jan. 22.

Violation of the ordinance will carry a maximum fine of $999 and up to 180 days in jail.

[ben4372]

Isn't there a state law saying locals can't have more restrictive gun laws that the state. The only exception were Denver laws already in place?

Fvck Denver and this state. In am tossing a 30 rounder in the trunk out of spite.

Ten or so years ago a progun group, I forget who, sent out a letter. It had the statute and a note from a lawyer. It used to be a no no to even go through Denver with standard capacity mags. Though I think it never much mattered. Either way, I wish we had the PR the homeless folks have. They would embrace us, and we could do no wrong.

[CoGirl303]

Meanwhile, the casual violence we see every day in Denver is not a problem for the shitty council.

Does this surprise you? These are the same people who think blowing $14 Million on a stupid electronic super-sized welcome sign by the airport is somehow more important than fixing all the potholes and crumbling roads in and around the city.

[Eric P]

Does this surprise you? These are the same people who think blowing $14 Million on a stupid electronic super-sized welcome sign by the airport is somehow more important than fixing all the potholes and crumbling roads in and around the city.

Not to disappoint, but the airport is self sufficient. Tax money is no longer going to build or rebuild infrastructure. Airport income from fees, tolls and parking can not be used for anything other the airport.

[CoGirl303]

Not to disappoint, but the airport is self sufficient. Tax money is no longer going to build or rebuild infrastructure. Airport income from fees, tolls and parking can not be used for anything other the airport.

well that's good to know. I thought the city of Denver was funding the sign.