Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Mcree went full Mcreetard
https://www.reddit.com/r/longrange/c...for_a_chassis/
----
I fail to see how simply placing a cant indicator in a stock is patent infringement. I can understand if the method of placing it is patented, etc., but the concept in general?
On the upside, having moved away from the jackassery that is Remington, I no longer need/desire Scott's wares, so this is a non-issue for me...
Thoughts?
Last edited by CS1983; 01-11-2018 at 10:23.
Feedback
It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton
Having the level in the chassis is the last place you want it anyway . IIRC this popped up about 6 ish months ago . Past that this is a classic case of lawyers looking to get paid and a manufacturer alienating potential customers .
I wonder how he would feel about possible infringement for this image?
Feedback
It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton
Dammit I really liked his chassis what the mother f er is wrong with people.
I agree about the stock level being worthless unless I’m mounting a scope. The rest of the time I use the bubble level on the scope
Tho it will make me a begger in the streets burn it if you must
John Adams to George Washington
Its not. Its only infringement if they have a patent that covers the concept AND you market and sell them, passing it off as your own design or try to pass it off as a genuine McRee. Possessing a rifle with one is not infringement (not by the owner, maybe by the seller), making one at home on your own is not infringement, making a one off and then selling it is probably not even infringement.Originally Posted by CavSct1983
All they're doing is making themselves look silly at best and like a-holes you don't want to do business with at worst. They're not helping themselves.
Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".
"Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
"Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
-Penn Jillette
A World Without Guns <- Great Read!
Making a one-off and selling it is an infringement, but damages are based on the harm to the patent holder's business and the monies made by the infringer, so a one-off simply isn't worth the filing fees to even attempt to litigate, usually.
"The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback
Well, marked him down as "Never do business with". Threatening individuals is classic patent troll bullying.
Sayonara
Patent infringement against a buyer?
That's full alright! I guess every customer is supposed to be a patent attorney.
Always eat the vegans first
What a moron.
This is just as dumb as Apple's "slide to unlock" patent battle.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote