A non NFA SBR?

[MarkCO]

If they are available today, they will sell a boatload of them to tactical Timmeys and maybe survivalist types. Good for them for figuring out how to charge a bucket full of money for them.

[izzy]

It's a bummer they didn't find a better loophole. Guess it got some attention to their company though. I'd rather pay the $200 and wait a year than buy one of those. I would like to see the shuttle cock ammo though. I can't imagine they're going to sell many of these.

[CS1983]

Lol. In other news, a car that doesn't need gas -- has a hole in the floorboard for you to plod along like Fred Flintstone.

[hollohas]

http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-c...6727015755.jpg

Projectile under development.

[Joe_K]

After watching the video with the Franklin armory guys from shot, they suggest that the shotgun is a shotgun because it has a smooth or, and a rifle is a rifle because it has rifling that projects spin to the projectile. So what I’m wondering is if you can legally take a rifled slug barrel and put it in a shotgun you do not change the legal definition of that shotgun to a rifle, so if someone were to buy this Franklin armory SBF and installed a rifled barrel what would be the difference?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Irving]

Well, since the minimum barrel length for a shotgun is longer than the rifle minimum, it doesn't really matter if the designation changed, right? Serious question.

[68Charger]

After watching the video with the Franklin armory guys from shot, they suggest that the shotgun is a shotgun because it has a smooth or, and a rifle is a rifle because it has rifling that projects spin to the projectile. So what I’m wondering is if you can legally take a rifled slug barrel and put it in a shotgun you do not change the legal definition of that shotgun to a rifle, so if someone were to buy this Franklin armory SBF and installed a rifled barrel what would be the difference?

no difference from if you built one from scratch with a stock on a lower and a rifled barrel less that 16"... it's a felony

This whole idea is one ruling away from being banned... I get the ambiguity- it's not "rifled" because there's no twist... it's not a shotgun, because the bore is not smooth. Rifled barrels on shotguns have been allowed as a "sporting" exception... but that's to avoid DD, not SBS/SBR... since the bore is over .500"

[izzy]

http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-c...6727015755.jpg

Projectile under development.

Don't know why but it reminds me of a lawn dart. I want something that'll shoot those!

[vossman]

That FA rep doesn't seem to be too into their new product.

The secret is in.

It uses straight lands and groves. in other words, there is no rifling so it's not a rifle.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...s-reformation/

4-5" groups at 100 yards in a $2000 "non rifle"???

No thanks. A pistol arm brace will continue work just fine.

[tmckay2]

Frankly I don't see the big market to skirt sbrs. Sure there's time involved but it's pretty cheap and easy. Full auto skirting I get. It is super expensive to do "legally".