SB18-052 - Repeal Ammunition Magazine Prohibition

[00tec]

what exactly is a multi-burst trigger activator? I don't have a login so I can't read the article. Guessing they mean a bump fire stock?

Here's the text.
http://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb18-051

[CS1983]

Reading the text, I can’t help but wonder if they know their first bullet point is covered by NFA and the 2nd bullet point simply doesn’t exist because there is no device to increase the firing rate (I.e., cyclic rate), as that is a mechanical limitation by design.

What mouth breathing, idiotic Dim wrote this crap?

[00tec]

Sen. Michael Merrifield, D-Colorado Springs

[CS1983]

Just checked and I’m outside of his district. Sheesh, what a dolt.

The creation of NFA items is a felony
Making something faster, an impossibility, is also a felony.

Ain’t a representative government grand? Lol

[00tec]

The way I understand it, a stronger trigger or buffer spring could technically make an AR cycle faster, until it won't cycle anyway....

I challenge any of these dumbasses to time how fast they can do a mag dump with a bump stock and a geissele compared to Jerry Miculek with a mil spec trigger group. They gonna ban the old man?

[CobaltSkink]

I'm inside his district, but those nice people from the International Benevolent Order of Assclowns sent me a restraining order that I shall not insult their organization.

[kidicarus13]

.

[KevDen2005]

.

Three seconds? I guess I'll just bring my muzzle loader!

[DDT951]

Where da fuk you get that information, VPC ??? Seriousely...... The anti gun faction has NEVER compromised.

But since you believe they have, here's a short read regarding the current crop of D compromise.

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/01/1...ump-stock-ban/


State Sen. Mike Merrifield, D-Colorado Springs, introduced a bill the first day of the 2018 session to make the sale, purchase or possession of a multi-burst trigger activator a Class 5 felony punishable by a one to three years in prison. The measure includes tougher penalties for subsequent violations and builds on current restrictions for firearm silencers and machine guns.


Merrifield acknowledged the politics surrounding his bill, saying he was “flabbergasted” that Republicans could oppose such a measure.

“I’m waiting for somebody to explain to me a legitimate reason why any gun owner would need to convert a legal weapon into an illegal weapon,” he said.

In an interview, Gov. John Hickenlooper stopped short of supporting a full ban on bump stocks. Instead, he said, the devices should be subject to the same stringent approval process that applies to owning an automatic weapon.

“I’m not saying ban them,” the Democrat said. “I’m just saying you put them in the same category with weapons that are, with all intents and purposes, identical.





BTW: you've conveniently avoided answering my last question in post # 68

1st. I didn't avoid. No time. I have a few minutes before work this morning so I need to keep it short.

To fight against them, you need at least understand how they think.

To a anti gun person this multi burst trigger ban (and the 15 round limit) are a compromise. They are compromising on getting what they really want. They really want a complete ban on guns. To them any thing less is a compromise.

But they understand they won't get what they really want. They don't say "all or nothing". They will settle for the small incremental wins knowing it at least gets them closer to their end goals. They are playing the long game.

How well, since 2013, has the no compromise tactic worked to get us normal magazines back?

Sometimes small incremental wins are needed.

[Great-Kazoo]

1st. I didn't avoid. No time. I have a few minutes before work this morning so I need to keep it short.

To fight against them, you need at least understand how they think.

To a anti gun person this multi burst trigger ban (and the 15 round limit) are a compromise. They are compromising on getting what they really want. They really want a complete ban on guns. To them any thing less is a compromise.

But they understand they won't get what they really want. They don't say "all or nothing". They will settle for the small incremental wins knowing it at least gets them closer to their end goals. They are playing the long game.

How well, since 2013, has the no compromise tactic worked to get us normal magazines back?

Sometimes small incremental wins are needed.

How long you been shooting AR's, again, or other semi-autos ? AS i asked before.. Knowing a bill to limit magazine capacity to 15 rounds had a good chance of passing. You failed to plan ahead, no reason for your compromise B.S other than that.

Or is there?

What else you willing to compromise on with mine and other gun owners firearms to appease the AG crowd.,

Clearly you have no issue with a multi burst, what ever that unicorn is, trigger. Maybe collapsible stocks, yeah that's it you're willing to give them up too.

Throw in the extra $5 per mag fee. Why not up the BGC to mmmm say $50. What's your threshold per round fee, before you take action? Or is that on the table too , after all it's reasonable