Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Grand Master Know It All Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    LITTLETON, CO
    Posts
    2,552

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    It seems to me that any program that it's designed to be easy to use, can also be easy to abuse. Make it too difficult to abuse, and it will no longer be as useful as intended. Adding government to anything usually adds a layer of complication.
    Gov is already it in. Itís the gov that takes from paychecks and redistributes.

    Asking for objective qualification shouldnít be controversial. If we want to help people, with finite resources, we have to discriminate.
    Fuckin' liberals...

  2. #22
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,521

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    If the focus were more on the type of people who are able to qualify for the program then I wouldn't waste a second thought on what it was for or how they were using it. The real problem is the people that are currently receiving assistance have ZERO business being on it and it makes it easier to criticize what they spend it on.
    Completely agree.

  3. #23
    Grand Master Know It All hobowh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    littleton
    Posts
    3,422

    Default

    I'm pretty sure it already covers it anyway... dogs love rice and hamburger with veggies, cats couldn't tell you but there is something there... though if your that broke you could just go stir fry and save a trip to the store just don't tell them what they ate till the day after it runs out
    The Hobo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •