Close
Page 41 of 43 FirstFirst ... 313637383940414243 LastLast
Results 401 to 410 of 423
  1. #401
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,921

    Default

    Policing is different in South Florida, I used to live there...

    https://cbs12.com/news/local/video-t...broward-county
    Per Ardua ad Astra

  2. #402
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,909

    Default

    There is the old mantra that LE have no "Duty to Protect".
    The duty is owed to the public at large, not to an individual. In other words, police do not have a duty to be your bodyguard.

    Warren vs. District of Columbia:

    "In a 4-3 decision, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial courts' dismissal of the complaints against the District of Columbia and individual members of the Metropolitan Police Department based on the public duty doctrine ruling that 'the duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists'. The Court thus adopted the trial court's determination that no special relationship existed between the police and appellants, and therefore no specific legal duty existed between the police and the appellants."
    With the amount of time the SRO had spent at the school (years) the argument can be made that there was a "Special Relationship" present and therefore, he had a duty to protect.

    He had one duty at that school, and he willfully neglected that duty.

    Enjoy your retirement asshole.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  3. #403
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth, CO
    Posts
    1,170

    Default

    but yet we see the words, "To serve and protect" and many police vehicles. So do they or don't they "protect"? Do they get to decide when and where there "protect" citizens at large?
    Laws aren't "preventable" measures. IOW, more gun laws won't stop mass shootings.

  4. #404
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    773

    Default

    I agree Skip, I thought the exact same thing. Between Gonzales v. Town of Castle Rock and the recent judge ruling in the Parkland case, it does seem conflicting. Don't get me wrong I think he is a worthless POS, but the legal interpretation of these has been laid out. There are some charges against him that do not apply to this legal standing, like perjury. It may be a case of throw everything against and some will stick, some will get tossed but mostly a negotiation, you gotta start high.
    Last edited by cmailliard; 06-04-2019 at 15:14.

  5. #405
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,454
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TRnCO View Post
    but yet we see the words, "To serve and protect" and many police vehicles. So do they or don't they "protect"? Do they get to decide when and where there "protect" citizens at large?
    They do...but in a general sense. Police can't be everywhere at once. Do you really want a police/government presence in your home or workplace watching over you all the time? I think not.


    Quote Originally Posted by cmailliard View Post
    I agree Skip, I thought the exact same thing. Between Gonzales v. Town of Castle Rock and the recent judge ruling in the Parkland case, it does seem conflicting. Don't get me wrong I think he is a worthless POS, but the legal interpretation of these has been laid out. There are some charges against him that do not apply to this legal standing, like perjury. It may be a case of throw everything against and some will stick, some will get tossed but mostly a negotiation, you gotta start high.
    I don't know about the perjury charge, but I'll be really surprised to see a conviction on any of the other charges. As a matter of fact, I'd be surprised if the first thing the defense does isn't to file a motion to dismiss most of that.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  6. #406
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,909

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cmailliard View Post
    I agree Skip, I thought the exact same thing. Between Gonzales v. Town of Castle Rock and the recent judge ruling in the Parkland case, it does seem conflicting. Don't get me wrong I think he is a worthless POS, but the legal interpretation of these has been laid out. There are some charges against him that do not apply to this legal standing, like perjury. It may be a case of throw everything against and some will stick, some will get tossed but mostly a negotiation, you gotta start high.
    Would not
    "the duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large"
    in this instance be the population of the school?
    I think regardless of previous interpretations this argument can be made.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  7. #407
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,921

    Default If the SRO has one function, that is to stop an active shooter. PERIOD.

    The elected officials have to have a designated scapegoat. Elected official "A" fires elected official "B". The public officials still feel the outrage from the voters, so they offer up a sacrificial lamb. If Al Qaeda did this, the Air Force would still be bombing their camps overseas. The SRO should have been a SPECOPS type guy, not some 60 y/o guy nearing retirement. Broward county is 2 million people and the sheriffs office has a 740 million dollar budget.
    When you have an active shooter in a school, you need a BADASS super fit guy, not a near retiree. And that is the fault of the elected officials.
    The elected officials will NEVER blame themselves.
    Per Ardua ad Astra

  8. #408
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Colorado is gearing up to put retired, volunteer vets into schools to walk the halls. It's called Operation Guardian Angel or something.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  9. #409
    Grand Master Know It All Duman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,638

    Default

    "The duty is owed to the public at large, not to an individual. In other words, police do not have a duty to be your bodyguard. "

    One is an individual.... how many people constitute 'the public' ?

  10. #410
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Scott Peterson is really turning out to be an unfortunate name, by the way.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •