Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
But if they define them that way in the law does that not create a "loophole" and keep binaries legal?

I hate the semantics of "one round per single operation of the trigger" defining our rights, but that was the deal we struck in 1934 and 1986.
If they define it as multiple rounds from a single trigger pull, then all they are doing is reiterating NFA and bump stocks remain legal -- unless they intend to redefine "machine gun" under NFA.