They're inviting a risk of pandora's box of Ruby Ridges to take place with this nonsense should it pass.
However it's still open for discussion because it's still in open comment status, plus Guns of America and some other 2A organizations will be filing a lawsuit to contest it when they officially rule on it and ban them.
I'd say GOA has a pretty good chance to win too based on the ATF's initial ruling in 2009 and some good science (physics) on their side. They need to attack the language of the term machine gun. That's the key. A few video demonstrations of bump firing with belt loops and wooden dowels will support the physical evidence that a bump stock is not and never has been a machine gun. A quality physicist with a PhD as an expert witness would serve them well here.
Ummm, it was legal from 2009-Present to have them, how can they pre-date legal purchases as illegal by retroatively ruling them prohibited?With limited exceptions, primarily as to government agencies, the GCA makes it unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machinegun unless it was lawfully possessed prior to the effective date of the statute. The bump-stock-type devices covered by this proposed rule were not in existence prior to the GCA's effective date, and therefore would fall within the prohibition on machineguns if this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is implemented.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk







Reply With Quote
