Bolton Replaces McMaster as National Security Advisor

[Gman]

McMaster to Resign as National Security Adviser, and Will Be Replaced by John Bolton

WASHINGTON — Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the battle-tested Army officer tapped as President Trump’s national security adviser last year to stabilize a turbulent foreign policy operation, will resign and be replaced by John R. Bolton, a hard-line former United States ambassador to the United Nations, White House officials said Thursday.

I think this is a great move. I still remember when the UN was pushing their small arms treaty and the Obama administration was looking at it with interest, John Bolton was totally opposed to it.

Obama’s parting shot

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty gives away the rights of all Americans

From the very start though, gun control groups looked upon the treaty as an end run around America’s domestic reluctance to adopt their agenda — if Congress and the state legislatures wouldn’t pass gun control why not get the U.N. to make it a permanent part of its agenda or even better part of international law? Gun control groups have pursued their agenda at the organization since 1995 but were frustrated by the likes of Ambassador John R. Bolton who single-handedly stopped a U.N. treaty effort in 2001 that would have regulated U.S. civilian firearms.

[wctriumph]

It seems like we are getting both people getting fired and other jumping ship.

The commies are going to have a field day.

But in the the end, it is all misdirection and distraction.

[davsel]

Bolton should have been in from the beginning.
Good move!

[roberth]

This is a good move.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/03/m...-out-bolton-in

This was long overdue. McMaster held to the Obama view that Islamic jihad terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, and that we mustn’t offend Muslims by noting the obvious fact that there are numerous Islamic texts and teachings that exhort Muslims to wage war against unbelievers.

[Skip]

Bolton better be worth the $1.3T we likely just paid for him.

[CoGirl303]

Bolton better be worth the $1.3T we likely just paid for him.

Yeah if you mean worth it in terms of war.

This was the same guy who said he believed Saddam had chemical and bio weapons munitions and justified the war in Iraq on those pretenses.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BushMasterBoy]

Russia is fielding a huge new rocket. 3 times the size of our Minuteman III. One of these could turn Colorado into a place nobody could live in for thousands of years. On the other hand, the alien civilization depicted in the Chilbolton crop circle could be a extinction level event. I'm so sad it has come to this. Washington is so screwed up. Maybe we can survive this administration too.DC= Deception City

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q0NjXqAy8M

[Gman]

This was the same guy who said he believed Saddam had chemical and bio weapons munitions and justified the war in Iraq on those pretenses.

Saddam used the weapons on the Kurds, so he did have them. The delays by the UN in taking action allowed him to either move or destroy them.

[Bailey Guns]

This was the same guy who said he believed Saddam had chemical and bio weapons munitions and justified the war in Iraq on those pretenses.

Practically everyone believed Saddam had chemical weapons because he did. As Gman said, he used them on his own people and with all the fiddle-fuckin' around had plenty of time to move them or hide them. Bolton (and everyone else who believed Saddam had WMDs) believed the way he did because just about every US and foreign intelligence source out there was saying he did. He didn't just come up with that on his own.

[CS1983]

We have had presence in Iraq for 15 years now. Where are the stockpiles of scary chem?

If him having chemical weapons was an actual problem, we'd have done something after Halabja.

Saddam was a secular dictator with dreams of grandeur, and was despised by the likes of Osama Bin Laden as an apostate from Islam. He was no supporter of the likes which we faced over there post-invasion. Heck, I've been served food by a guy we saw on videos chopping off heads. One day he is AQI-aligned in Ameriyah, and the next he's an ally? BULLSHIT.

What changed from this interview in 1994 to 2003, except an excuse to enact a globalist plan to destabilize the Middle East? What we should have done is make Saddam a good ally instead of the retarded CIA crap of giving over Middle East assets to the Russians. We got rid of one Saddam for hundreds of Saddams and Bin Ladens, be they nationalists or actual jihadis. I'm not saying Saddam was a good guy, but he was a far sight better than Iraq today.



Further, when has Bashar Al-Assad ever supported terrorism? His own father was castigated by the international community for bringing to life the wetdream style quotes of General Mattis. He utterly slaughtered the Sunni terrorists when they tried to overthrow the Assad regime, back in the 1980's. Being an Alawite sect Muslim, he's less dangerous to US interests than our own politicians.

What good did overthrowing Ghaddafi or Mubarak do? In Mubarak's place we got a dedicated adherent to the friggin' Muslim Brotherhood (Morsi).

Libya is in utter chaos.

Who, and what, does such destabilization serve? Certainly not the average person on the ground in the Middle East and certainly not the US.