Dems want Colorado Red Flag Law

[DenverGP]

chickenpooper can't write a law, he can only sign one.

Like that ever stopped obama from using executive orders.... The constitution is no problem for dems.

[buffalobo]

Kill committee finally worked in our favor for once.

[buffalobo]

chickenpooper can't write a law, he can only sign one.

Thanks for answering this. I get tired of attempting to explain to people basic government functions.

He can issue executive orders. Which is what the poster was refering to. Never referred to legislation.

[CoGirl303]

He can issue executive orders. Which is what the poster was refering to. Never referred to legislation.

reading is fundamental.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CoGirl303]

If only understanding of government was fundamental. The topic was on point; Hick is not going to pass an EO because he lacks the ability to pass such an EO, he cannot pass this (bill) as an EO "law". Much like a congressmen declaring a defendant "guilty" on behalf of a jurist; there are some lines that can't be crossed even if you want to get fuzzy.
Yes, executive overreaches, but their arm presently only reaches so far.

he already said in the initial article in the first post that he'd consider an EO if it didn't pass.

Rules seem not to apply to Liberals for whatever reason.

I wouldn't put it past him to do it anyways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[thedave1164]

he already said in the initial article in the first post that he'd consider an EO if it didn't pass.

Rules seem not to apply to Liberals for whatever reason.

I wouldn't put it past him to do it anyways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He can spout all he wants, he can not make a law with an EO.

He can not make a red flag law with an EO

[DenverGP]

He can spout all he wants, he can not make a law with an EO.


He can not make a red flag law with an EO

Would you put it past him to direct CBI to deny anyone on a super-secret liberal judge controlled watch list?

[Gman]

(I did expect passage, and I was serious. But now, you all will never know...)

"Never" will likely come around next year.

Sent from my electronic leash using Tapatalk

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

What would a law that keep guns out of the hands of people like Cruz and Holmes look like? I think the major thing would be that we decide who is just crazy dangerous and irrespective of guns have a way to commit them. The focus is not on gun ownership, but the threat to the community. I’m not talking ‘Pre-crime’ here since it isn’t the threat or the crazy, it the threat and the crazy together. There has to be the right thing between throwing your hands in the air and saying nothing works and screaming that something has to be done.

If this plays out again after the fall elections, I doubt we can depend on a committee kill to stop the ‘something’ and then there will be ‘nothing’ we can do.

[D_F]

I've already seen $20 an hour, signature collector jobs advertised that allude to a gun referendum of some sort. Long way from over.