Close
Page 2 of 17 FirstFirst 123456712 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 161
  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Northglenn, CO
    Posts
    947

    Default Dems want Colorado Red Flag Law

    I love how Dickinhispooper says if nothing is done he will consider an executive action.

    So basically this lame duck is giving the G.A. an ultimatum to either do something or he will.

    Typical liberal trying to strong arm people to get what they want.



    Hickenlooper, a term-limited Democrat, supports a “red flag” law, but he is deferring to the General Assembly to draft a bill. Though if no action is taken, the governor acknowledged Thursday, he would consider executive action on the issue.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by CoGirl303; 04-17-2018 at 17:42.

  2. #12
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colo Spgs
    Posts
    1,071

    Default

    The only way to achieve compliance is with registration :|

  3. #13
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Foothills (outside denver)
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    There are already 20,000 UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws now.

  4. #14
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Sometimes we get help from strange bedfellows:

    "The ACLU analysis notes that the court order authorized by the legislation could be issued without any indication that the person poses an imminent threat to others, and without any evidence that he or she ever committed, or has even threatened to commit, an act of violence with a firearm. Further, the court decision would be made at a hearing where the person would not be entitled to appointed counsel. Under the legislation, a court order would require the confiscation for at least a year of any firearms lawfully owned by the person, place the burden on him or her to prove that they should be returned after that time, potentially subject him or her to a coerced mental health evaluation, and give police broad authority to search their property for firearms.

    Among the other points raised by the ACLU’s analysis:

    The standard for seeking and issuing an order is so broad it could routinely be used against people who engage in “overblown political rhetoric” on social media or against alleged gang members when police want to find a shortcut to seize lawfully-owned weapons from them.
    Even before a court hearing is held, and a decision is made, on a petition for an ERPO, police could be required to warn potentially hundreds of people that the individual might pose a significant danger to them.
    Without the presence of counsel, individuals who have no intent to commit violent crimes could nonetheless unwittingly incriminate themselves for lesser offenses."

    http://www.riaclu.org/news/post/aclu...un-legislation
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  5. #15
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Those warning that liberals would abuse this law and don't think that conservatives would do the very same are living in la la land.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  6. #16
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Those warning that liberals would abuse this law and don't think that conservatives would do the very same are living in la la land.
    Patriot Act and R.I.C.O

    No political party is beyond abusing their power.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  7. #17
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm not talking about parties, I'm talking about individual people.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  8. #18
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,959

    Default

    Reporters should be held accountable for false and/or harassing reports. Should be able to be sued for damages and emotional distress over losing one's rights for self protection and legal process.

    Reporting should not be anonymous, and shall be forced to appear to testify under oath.

    But the whole law is bull.

  9. #19
    Machine Gunner thedave1164's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Evans, Colorado
    Posts
    1,810

    Default

    JUST SAY NO!

  10. #20
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    Reporters should be held accountable for false and/or harassing reports. Should be able to be sued for damages and emotional distress over losing one's rights for self protection and legal process.

    Reporting should not be anonymous, and shall be forced to appear to testify under oath.

    But the whole law is bull.
    Like filing a restraining order.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •