Quote Originally Posted by foxtrot View Post
If only understanding of government was fundamental. The topic was on point; Hick is not going to pass an EO because he lacks the ability to pass such an EO, he cannot pass this (bill) as an EO "law". Much like a congressmen declaring a defendant "guilty" on behalf of a jurist; there are some lines that can't be crossed even if you want to get fuzzy.
Yes, executive overreaches, but their arm presently only reaches so far.
he already said in the initial article in the first post that he'd consider an EO if it didn't pass.

Rules seem not to apply to Liberals for whatever reason.

I wouldn't put it past him to do it anyways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk