No where in the article was there any concern or disagreement with spending more money on the problem or a suggestion that there are too many homeless. Just a desire that the city allocate more funds to managing the "side effects" of the homeless better. No suggestion about discouraging homeless people from coming there or evicting current homeless.

Not really much different than the complaints of Coloradoans bitching about potholes to CDOT and the local city entity.

Now, the discussion of whether the residents of SanFran understand financial implications of additional spending is a whole other conversation.