CU Boulder Pronoun identification selection

[CS1983]

1) How do I know? I won't publicly say, but if you want to message me we can discuss it.



2) The biological norm may very well be heterosexual, but homosexuality in animals and humans alike have been around for thousands of years. Transgender people have also been around just as long, but surgical advances were not readily available until the past 100 years.



3) Pedophiles...I'm not sure how that works to be honest, but regardless whether that's a choice or some misconfigured brain wiring, a chemical imbalance or a genetic defect...it's against the LAW. PERIOD. I know there's a disgusting liberal movements to "normalize" pedophilia and I am 100% against those movements.


4) I'm fine with people who are LGBTQ. It is their life and they are free to do as they want (as long as it doesn't break the law or cause physical harm to others). Love is love to me.



5) I draw the line at child porn, pedophilia and bestiality. Those should ALWAYS be illegal PERIOD. FOREVER.

....


6) just wait till transgender women start getting womb implants and carrying their own children and giving birth via c-section. You'll really have a conniption fit I suppose.

http://www.ladbible.com/news/interes...abies-20171105


and if gene replacement therapy is possible to reverse human aging...it's only a matter of time before gene/chromosome replacement therapies can fully change a person's genetic sex/gender.


SCIENCE IS AMAZING!

Numbered for ease of reply.

1) Apologies, and no aspersions meant to be cast your way, but I have no private contact with women not my wife or family out of respect for her and lessons I watched others learn the hard way in both the Army and civilian work environments. Particularly on this subject, I cannot in good conscience send you a PM.

2) Let's rephrase this and see what you think: the dietary norm may very well not involve cannibalism, but cannibalism in animals and humans alike has been around for thousands of years.

Not exactly a rhetorical win, eh?

Homosexuality in animals is not a conscious decision. Animals do not have rational souls, and thus their decisions are based on things like emotion (which they do have), physical desires, expression of dominance, etc.

Homosexuality is an exclusionary orientation towards another in the context of sex. Animals do not display exclusionary orientation, but may or may not engage in specific individual acts. There's a distinct difference.

Until recently, the very same science you laud recognized homosexuality for what it is: a psychological illness.

As to so-called Transgender people, they too are mentally ill. They have developed an alter-ego character in their minds which allows them to obfuscate, hide from, or address issues they have with themselves as they are. One does not change their sex, simply. A "woman" from Thailand who would put most actual woman to physical shame, if a genetic test is done, will be shown to be a male. What we have is a societal acceptance and encouragement of a mental illness, diagnosed as such, called gender dysphoria. A similar diagnosis is "body integrity identity disorder", where people literally see their arm, leg, or whatever as not part of them and not in accordance with their true self. We'd rightly say anyone who travels to Trinidad, CO to have their perfectly functional arm hacked off as screwed up in the head. We would not, I'd hope, encourage that!

3) Why exactly does legality matter for pedophiles and not homosexuals and transgenders? The latter two used to be illegal in practice as well. They were illegal, as is pedophilia, because they are morally repugnant to be acted out and disturbing to be tempted towards. What will you say when, not if, it's legalized? Don't think it will happen? Think again. And when someone tries to groom a 10 year old boy, and the kid's dad pops two 12ga shells of buckshot into the Pedo, the dad will be the bigoted bad guy getting in the way of "love".

4) So if homosexual acts and attempted sex changes were once again made illegal, you'd just stuff all your pro-X arguments in a box? That's a rather milquetoast position if so. And why is it ok for a person to cause physical harm to themselves when acting out their mental illness, but not another? What if someone had a fetish for chopping off limbs, and another had BIID? Should it be ok for them to, as two consenting adults, engage in a machete and branding iron operation?

5) Why? Love is love, right? What if some dude's dog humps his leg, and so he decides to let the dog screw him? If animals can make a decision to engage in homosexual behavior, as you have claimed, then what's the problem? What about when a couple build a sex chamber in their RV so they can screw their Husky? Was that not ok prior to 2007, when bestiality was finally made illegal in CO? Cus a couple in Aurora just got arrested for that very thing in April. Dude looks like a normal enough guy. She looks like she was probably a looker back in her own day... screwing the dog: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...x-chamber.html

Where do you draw the line on pedophilia and child porn? Is it 12? 13? Cus that's the age bracket of the youngest to ever be tried as adults in the US for 1st degree murder: https://abcnews.go.com/US/youngest-c...ry?id=32644967

6) There is much more to gestating a child to term than simply having a uterus. Hormonal changes, actual reactions and releases, occur. A transgender "woman" cannot produce eggs. They cannot produce any of the hormones necessary. It would be an entirely fictitious even nowhere on the level of an actual pregnancy and birth.