New primary system..

[Irving]

If anyone has ever complimented the Democratic Party, or voters, for their ability to stick together on the same page and at least get their candidate elected, then voting for the "worst" democrat in your opinion is the absolute worst move possible.

[Zundfolge]

Yeah, because leaving 1/3 of the voters out of the primary is a good idea... I was "unaffiliated" before I left, because I couldn't bear to be affiliated with the idiocy that was the Colorado GOP.

Then you should have no say in who the GOP candidate is. Just like you should have no say in how the Elks club is run if you're not a member.

If you want a say in who the party picks as candidate is you should have to join the party.

If anyone has ever complimented the Democratic Party, or voters, for their ability to stick together on the same page and at least get their candidate elected, then voting for the "worst" democrat in your opinion is the absolute worst move possible.

When I say "worst" I mean the one that has the least chance in the general election, not the most horrible Democrat (since that's all of them).

[Irving]

Voting for the worst is a very bad idea, because they might just win the election.

This is what I meant.

[DenverGP]

Voting for the worst is a very bad idea, because they might just win the election.

I can just imagine some dem voters who crossed the lines and voted for trump in the republican primaries thinking that there is no way he'd ever win.... They'll that take secret to their graves.

[Delfuego]

Vote the most batshit insane leftist for the dems, vote the most right leaning GOP person in the areas of gun rights/immigration.

You're an idiot. This is the behavior that has gotten us into the intractable mess our government is currently in. Please "F" off back to NV or wherever you actually are from. You contribute nothing.

[Bailey Guns]

You're an idiot. This is the behavior that has gotten us into the intractable mess our government is currently in. Please "F" off back to NV or wherever you actually are from. You contribute nothing.

Yeah. And this post contributes what exactly?

[Great-Kazoo]

Same thing here. Probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 to 30 percent of state and local offices don't even get a D candidate because they know it's a waste of time and money. The down side is you may have 8 or 9 R candidates running for a seat and it's hard to wade thru the BS to pick the best one.

Not 2018, but 2020 based on current CA influx to Boise, ID may get a shock come election time.
It's the 2nd largest growing place where CA residents have been moving. Get enough to move the needle even 1 state seat, will empower the leftist more.

Voting for the worst is a very bad idea, because they might just win the election.

For how hard all 3d's are going hard left of center, i would not be surprised if Kennedy or that other schmuck took the governors house.

What use to be confined to Boulder, spread to Denver. Now Ft Collins and IMO a moderate portion of weld cty has swung left. Ft Collins over taking Boulder as the bastion of progressive fuktards.

Unfortunately no matter what state one resides, the ever moving plague of locust progressives will be hard to contain.

[Irving]

Yeah. And this post contributes what exactly?

Are you defending this Nevada joker?

[68Charger]

Then you should have no say in who the GOP candidate is. Just like you should have no say in how the Elks club is run if you're not a member.

If you want a say in who the party picks as candidate is you should have to join the party.



When I say "worst" I mean the one that has the least chance in the general election, not the most horrible Democrat (since that's all of them).

Yeah, I became unaffiliated because the Colorado GOP was run so poorly I didn't want to be affiliated with it... what's to keep Dems from registering (R) just to vote for the worst? It's not like there is any security set up to prevent anything like that.

But whatever, I've got completely different voting issues now.

[Jer]

You can do how you wish. Personally, I don't see that voting for a pilot of the plane you're going to be on who can't fly as being a good idea. Remember, that pilot may end up winning if the majority of passengers can't discern his inability or simply don't vote and then you're on the flight.

Something tells me the founders of this great country didn't have "vote for the least likely to succeed candidate" anywhere in their sights when they thought this whole thing up. Personally, I want a good candidate that represents MY ideals regardless of affiliation. I also don't see the brave men and women who fought and died for that right expected we would us any aspect to vote for the person most likely to guide the train over a cliff. There's a lot of great men and women who went before us who did pretty brave things that I can't even contemplate in order for us to make this nation as great & successful as possible.

But... it's your vote.