Justice Kennedy retiring

[Irving]

I understand, and agree, that the artist picked the most simple way to illustrate "side" with the hats, but we're talking about a New York liberal that ran where he thought he could win. I feel like people really forget that and I just don't understand.

[Great-Kazoo]

I understand, and agree, that the artist picked the most simple way to illustrate "side" with the hats, but we're talking about a New York liberal that ran where he thought he could win. I feel like people really forget that and I just don't understand.

Forget? Some actually believe he's a conservative .

Trump's a moron. BUT...................................




He's not hillary and i picked him specifically for his 1 pick for a scotus appointment. Now it may well end up 3 total before 2020.


Question for you and everyone else. Do you actually believe there would be this much hand wringing if HRC was in office and she had another SCOTUS to nominate ? Fuck no, they'd be falling over them self shouting from the top of the mount how sensible her choice[s] for SCOTUS were

[roberth]

Forget? Some actually believe he's a conservative .

Trump's a moron. BUT...................................




He's not hillary and i picked him specifically for his 1 pick for a scotus appointment. Now it may well end up 3 total before 2020.


Question for you and everyone else. Do you actually believe there would be this much hand wringing if HRC was in office and she had another SCOTUS to nominate ? Fuck no, they'd be falling over them self shouting from the top of the mount how sensible her choice[s] for SCOTUS were

If HRC had won we'd have whole lot more to worry about than the Supreme Court.

[Skip]

In reality we shouldn't have Libs or Conservatives on the court. We should have strict Constitutionalists. Men and women who read the law, interpret it's letter, and create consistent precedents independent of political ideology.

Those are now known as Conservatives because Libs swayed the court from a principled body of jurists to policy makers, moving America to the left when the Legislative Branch wouldn't. And the policy precedents are decided by their Lib values (greater good, ends justify means, etc...). Many recent decisions written by Libs on the court don't even address the law (Janus dissenting is a great example).

To win at this game, we have to re-take the institutions or we lose. Big.

Trump moved the needle in the right direction.

That major USSC decision I'm whining about may now be decided by more Constitutionalists on the court who read the words of 2A and understand them.