Devil's Head defensive shooting

[Skip]

I've been searching for the passed version of 13-1224 and don't see a geographical requirement.

http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/cli...224sjud_01.pdf

24 (2) (a) A PERSON MAY POSSESS A LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINE IF
25 HE OR SHE:
26 (I) OWNS THE LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINE ON THE EFFECTIVE
27 DATE OF THIS SECTION; AND
-3- 1224
(II) MAINTAINS 1 CONTINUOUS POSSESSION OF THE LARGE-CAPACITY
2 MAGAZINE.

I'd like to know too, but we can only assume the mags were believed to be in compliance or illegal and DougCo doesn't care about the mag ban. If illegal, it is was either intentionally ignored or is "professional courtesy" (which doesn't exist for retirees in the law).

If illegal and anyone else in the state cares to investigate/prosecute they are messaging they wanted the BG to continue his rampage unimpeded and re-opening the conversation about citizens being able to overwhelm with force (capacity). This would be interesting. But the solution to restoring gun rights in CO is likely legal and not democratic (Denver/Boulder) so I'm not sure what good the discussion would do.

[Irving]

I'm wondering if this guy had stopped the problem with a few bottle rockets to the face and arm, if the conversion would be more, or less, surrounding the legality of his methods.

[Justin]

Note to self:

Wasn't worth it.

[DenverGP]

Yeah you can't bring them in no matter how old they are.

Nope, nothing in the law requires that they were already in colorado. Only that you owned them continuously since before the ban.