Who do we like for SCOTUS?

[sampson]

You're probably right. On the other hand, most -->> RATIONAL<<-- people realize she's had 36 years worth of chances to say what she's wanted to say. Testify or don't but stop playing your stupid fuckin' games.

Not sure how many rational people are voters.

[Skip]

Pussyhatters aren't giving this up. But a lot admit they are using this as payback for Garland. Which should expose them as cheapening sexual assault/claims.

The latest objection against flying, as trivial as that sounds, has actually made a difference for people.






ETA:

[Skip]

BREAKING



So some time next week...

"Negotiations?" Lulz. No truth teller needs to negotiate testimony.

I wouldn't be surprised if some new development changes things. Ford is taking on a lot of risk.

[Skip]

There is mass confusion over that attorney letter.

Media (incl. Drudge) has reported this as an agreement to appear. While it seems that way, it asks to continue negotiations. So no one knows what is going on right now.

This is all pretty disingenuous. Can't say it makes the victim look good at all.

[Skip]

Media has probably given up trying to accurately report testimony arrangement but I’m hearing Thursday.

Second witness named by Ford has denied any knowledge...

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...-letter-836913


To recap, the two people she named as seeing it all happen have said it didn’t. Only explanation is that she is lying.

It’s not looking good for her and since her testimony could result in perjury, I can’t imagine her counsel lets her testify.


Jack Posobiec has rundown on protest/disruption plans for next week...

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosob...37625247227905

[Eric P]

So it it is 2018.... the modern age doesn't need to meet face to face.

Have the skank video conference from a courthouse in CA after being sworn in. Same with any other witnesses. Hell, they could have her teleconference from anywhere.

Why does congress live in the technological dark ages??? Screw traditions and take full advantage of modern conveniences.

Maybe rosie is right and these current dinosaurs need to retire. D and R.

[Bailey Guns]

It appears Ford has named another witness who claims no knowledge of the party at all.

Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.

In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.

“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News.

This fiasco needs to be put to rest. Initially I was at least supportive of letting her tell her side of the story. But the more her and her lawyers drag this out and continue on making unreasonable demands the less sympathetic I am to her claim. She's basically holding the entire country hostage to a vague memory of an incident that no one else remembers.

[Skip]

It appears Ford has named another witness who claims no knowledge of the party at all.

This fiasco needs to be put to rest. Initially I was at least supportive of letting her tell her side of the story. But the more her and her lawyers drag this out and continue on making unreasonable demands the less sympathetic I am to her claim. She's basically holding the entire country hostage to a vague memory of an incident that no one else remembers.

I think the other good question is if this is a legitimate memory of hers at all.

[Bailey Guns]

Ford's attorneys have admitted to CNN that Ford and Keyser are life-long friends. Gonna be pretty hard to say this person is just trying to protect Kavanaugh.

That's enough for me. Ford has zero credibility and I believe her claim is fabricated. Whether or not it was her idea or she's just a democrat party stooge remains to be seen.

[Skip]

The involvement of Diane Feinstein, Debra Katz, Ricki Seidman, and now Michael Bromwich makes me think this was all a hit job and Ford was a willing participant. I think there is a substantial pool of money not only paying this team but also making sure Ford is taken care of because her life as she knew it is over. Her family will be wrecked too.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/...-bargain-time/

Seidman, a senior principal at TSD Communications, worked as Joe Biden’s communications director during the 2008 general election campaign, after he was named Barack Obama’s running mate. In 2009, according to her online biography, she helped the White House manage the confirmation of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

Before that, she worked in the Clinton White House as deputy communications director.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/20/polit...ser/index.html

Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is being represented by attorneys Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, both of whom are listed as headliners in a "cocktails and conversation" event for Baldwin, a Wisconsin Democrat who is facing re-election this fall. People are asked to contribute up to $1,000 to attend the October 1 event, and a source familiar with the matter said it is slated to take place at their law firm Katz, Marshall & Banks.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...ds-legal-team/

Andrew McCabe‘s attorney Michael R. Bromwich, along with his strategic consulting firm The Bromwich Group, have joined Dr. Christine Blasey Ford‘s legal team.

[snip]

Within the past few days I have been asked to be one of Christine Blasey Ford’s attorneys. My role will likely require me to appear publicly on Dr. Ford’s behalf, and the Senate is being advised of my involvement this afternoon. Because objections have been raised within the partnership to my doing so while employed by the firm. I am resigning from the firm effective immediately. This obviously is happening on a schedule that could not be anticipated.

What objections? Blowback for subornation of perjury?