Who do we like for SCOTUS?

[CS1983]

BP, your statement would indicate the Barrett is not solid in that regard compared to Kavenaugh. Is that your belief? If so, I'm wondering why.

[Rucker61]

BP, your statement would indicate the Barrett is not solid in that regard compared to Kavenaugh. Is that your belief? If so, I'm wondering why.

Just guessing - we don't know anything about Barrett's 2A position.

[Bailey Guns]

I don't think progressives give a rat's ass about trashing a conservative woman. Never have, never will. Their rules don't apply to them. All you need to do is look at how they've treated ANY conservative woman over the last 20 years. There's no better example than Melania Trump. The things they say about her are some of the most vile, disgusting things ANYONE has ever said about a woman.

[Irving]

I don't think Melania gets any worse treatment than Michelle did, but I'm not exactly paying attention. Also, is Melania even "conservative?"

I'm not disagreeing with your post though. Conservative women are barely even considered women to liberals that disagree with them.

[BPTactical]

I don't think Melania gets any worse treatment than Michelle did, but I'm not exactly paying attention. Also, is Melania even "conservative?"

I'm not disagreeing with your post though. Conservative women aren't even considered women to liberals.

RUFKM?
Melania has publicly been excoriated by not only Dems but the media has well.

Had any group gone after the wookie or it's crotch fruit the way this administrations spouse/ kids have been it would have been the hate crime of the century.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Thomas is 70 years old presently, and in 2020, will be 72. By 2024 he would be 76. So even with this appointment, there's a reasonably high chance that between 2020 and 2024, the court will shift majority socialist/liberal.

Granted, a lot of judges make it to 80 still serving, but it's a high stakes gamble to say he (and all the others) will be okay in 20. Especially when you have a lot of money and people quite interested in making sure he's not.

So once again, the news of Kennedy's retirement is good, but the realization our fucked up system works this way is not so much. We're good now, but irreparably screwed very, very soon, my money is on "less than a decade". Thing is constitutional people respect jurisprudence, socialists do not, so they'll just ignore any prior ruling, 2A or otherwise, and make the new rule of the land regardless.

Thomas could keel over at anytime, and if the Dems get the Senate back, Trump won't get another pic through on a "Garland on Steroids" Rule.

[Irving]

RUFKM?
Melania has publicly been excoriated by not only Dems but the media has well.

Had any group gone after the wookie or it's crotch fruit the way this administrations spouse/ kids have been it would have been the hate crime of the century.

My only experience is reading stuff from this website, so naturally you can see where I'm coming from.

[BPTactical]

My only experience is reading stuff from this website, so naturally you can see where I'm coming from.

Free your mind, your ass will follow....

[Vic Tory]

Two of these guys clerked for Kennedy. Barrett clerked for Scalia.

I'd like Barrett. (Or Mike Lee.)

[KAPA]

Two of these guys clerked for Kennedy. Barrett clerked for Scalia.

I'd like Barrett. (Or Mike Lee.)

Yes, Sen Mike Lee from Utah seems to be the dark horse. He was also interviewed by Trump and honestly it seems that he has the best record in terms of 2A. I feel like Trump will go with Barrett though. She will probably score him the most political points with her being female. The mom of 7 thing will score points with all those housewife types that couldn't quite bring themselves over to his side and pulled the lever for Hillary last time around. If she checks all his boxes, politically, she is a no brainer pick. Lets just hope one of his key boxes to check is the 2A box.

Still hoping for known quantity in Lee but a pro 2A Barrett would be even better.