Unfortunately I missed much past her opening statement, and I didn't hear his opening statement at all (heard it was good). I guess the point is that when someone has their past dragged out in public, and is forced to defend it, no one will come off looking fantastic. Mostly I was tired of his dancing around questions. As Skip pointed out, I understand that was part of the strategy to defend against what was pretty much a witch hunt from what I heard. The dems questions were pretty leading and ridiculous.