Close
Page 7 of 45 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111217 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 444
  1. #61
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,454
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I think the case involving Judge Kavanaugh (the mom) is going to turn out to be not such a big deal. From what I can tell she presided over the case which resulted in a settlement between the Blasey's and the lender. The Blasey's were able to keep the home. It appears they sold it in 2011.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ourt-case.html
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  2. #62
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,947

    Default

    Rake this person over the coals. No need to be civil, destroy her in the same manner she and other accusers are ruining others lives.

  3. #63
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    265

    Default

    This lady decides to bring this up now when he is getting confirmed under Trump? But silence for 30 years and when he was getting confirmed under Bush (2004?)? This is insane. Just another tactic from the left.

  4. #64
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    News today is she won't testify until after the FBI investigation. Why she gets to make that call is beyond me. She should be subpoenaed!

    I think the reason why is fairly apparent. She hasn't given a date/location of the incident. And it's not hard to see how risky that is if the FBI finds dates/locations which indicate Kavanaugh couldn't have done it. Having the FBI go first means they can manage the testimony/details to be consistent.

    They learned well from Anita Hill who's credibility was challenged once put under oath, had to stop lying, and was asked about her previous lies/forced to admit them.

    Think of the absurdity of this whole thing... A person can come out of the woodwork, accuse from 35 years ago, not have to give details until the FBI provides date/locations/details that can be worked into the testimony. Kavanaugh must be guilty! Somehow, some way.

    This is well beyond the "deep state," this is some top level Stasi bullshit!
    Always eat the vegans first

  5. #65
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    Any investigation would need to start with her interview by the FBI. If she were to knowingly provide this interviewing agents with false information she is in violation of 18 USC 1001.

    The FBI doesn’t have any jurisdiction here as rape, sexual assault are state crimes in Maryland. This would be investigated by the Montgomery County Police Department if the allegation contained enough details to warrant a case being opened.

    IMO Ms Ford’s attorneys are making these demands to slow the vote till after the midterm elections while making the GOP force the vote without giving her a full investigation. This tactic reinforces the “war on women” theme the Democrats have been so consistently harping on. The only thing missing from this allegation is the Rev Al Sharpton and the Duke lacrosse team.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  6. #66
    High Power Shooter Firehaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post

    They learned well from Anita Hill who's credibility was challenged once put under oath, had to stop lying, and was asked about her previous lies/forced to admit them.

    Think of the absurdity of this whole thing... A person can come out of the woodwork, accuse from 35 years ago, not have to give details until the FBI provides date/locations/details that can be worked into the testimony. Kavanaugh must be guilty! Somehow, some way.

    This is well beyond the "deep state," this is some top level Stasi bullshit!
    Anita Hill jumping in...so predictable and reeks of desperation.

    https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/09/19/...testifies.html


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #67
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    Any investigation would need to start with her interview by the FBI. If she were to knowingly provide this interviewing agents with false information she is in violation of 18 USC 1001.

    [snip]
    I would hope, but that is the old thinking. It is now perfectly acceptable to lie to the FBI if you are advancing the Lib agenda. There are plenty of politicized DoJ employees to cover that up or decline to prosecute.

    "I got confused" "I blocked it out" "It was so long ago, my memory was..."

    Libs would screech such accountability is victim shaming. They are already saying her life is in danger so she can't testify. Convenient, right?

    Everyone should face the fact that these exercises are relatively free (even lucrative) for #MeToo accusers under the new rules. That is the entire idea of building #MeToo as a movement and a device to attack.
    Always eat the vegans first

  8. #68
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    I think in old ways. It comes natural to me.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  9. #69
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    I think in old ways. It comes natural to me.
    That's the way it should be!

    But the law is no longer the law.
    Always eat the vegans first

  10. #70
    Varmiteer DireWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    DENVER CO
    Posts
    713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    This would be investigated by the Montgomery County Police Department if the allegation contained enough details to warrant a case being opened.
    Correct me if this is wrong, but even if she was telling the flat truth (while not impossible, is about as unlikely as anything I can think of), is there any scenario where MCPD would spend any time/resources investigating something which I would imagine has far exceeded the SOL (whatever that is in this instance)? I wouldn't think so...
    Last edited by DireWolf; 09-19-2018 at 10:25.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •