Close
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 66
  1. #11
    Splays for the Bidet CS1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    6,260

    Default

    Here are the DOT/MUCTD guidelines on art/colors in crosswalks:

    https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources...ns/3_09_24.htm

    These crosswalks are clearly a violation of published standards.

    The evolution of crosswalk treatments continued into the form of "crosswalk art" because it was becoming a common misconception that as long as the white transverse lines were present—thereby legally marking the crosswalk—then the agency was free to treat the interior portion of the crosswalk as it desired. In 2011, the FHWA issued an additional Official Ruling4 that crosswalk art—defined as any freeform design to draw attention to the crosswalk—would degrade the contrast of the white transverse lines against the composition of the pavement beneath it. In deviating from previous Official Rulings on the matter that concluded an increased factor of safety and decreased number of pedestrian deaths were not evident after installation, this 2011 Official Ruling stated that the use of crosswalk art is actually contrary to the goal of increased safety and most likely could be a contributing factor to a false sense of security for both motorists and pedestrians.

    The FHWA's position has always been, and continues to be that subdued-colored aesthetic treatments between the legally marked transverse crosswalk lines are permissible provided that they are devoid of retroreflective properties and that they do not diminish the effectiveness of the legally required white transverse pavement markings used to establish the crosswalk. Examples of acceptable treatments include brick lattice patterns, paving bricks, paving stones, setts, cobbles, or other resources designed to simulate such paving. Acceptable colors for these materials would be red, rust, brown, burgundy, clay, tan or similar earth tone equivalents. All elements of pattern and color for these treatments are to be uniform, consistent, repetitive, and expected so as not to be a source of distraction. No element of the aesthetic interior treatment is to be random or unsystematic. No element of the aesthetic interior treatment can implement pictographs, symbols, multiple color arrangements, etc., or can otherwise attempt to communicate with any roadway user.
    *Ring, Ring* "Hi Frank Azar, I'm about to take a walk... you busy today?"
    Feedback

    It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton

  2. #12
    Machine Gunner ben4372's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    englewood
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    Nearly every crosswalk in the city has some sort of tread mark on it. Is that paint even "traffic rated"? That painting and now the investigating of this is such a waste of resources. Let's post an officer on site to "patrol" it. Are we out of problems? I suppose the only thing left is to elect a modern "Caligula".

  3. #13
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CavSct1983 View Post
    Here are the DOT/MUCTD guidelines on art/colors in crosswalks:

    https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources...ns/3_09_24.htm

    These crosswalks are clearly a violation of published standards.



    *Ring, Ring* "Hi Frank Azar, I'm about to take a walk... you busy today?"
    Yup, clear violation.
    Only problem is the Fed DOT won't do shit about it, the Program Administrator for the Denver region is a former CDOT prick who is bedfellows with Denver, City and County of, Traffic who are all former CDOT babies.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  4. #14
    Proud Infidel beast556's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,765

    Default

    Just wait this is just the beginning. The more east coasters and califorians move here it will get much worse at a rapid pace.
    Don't be stupid!!!!!

  5. #15
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It's nothing new really. Police have been investigating dumb BS ever since the public has had the phone number to contact them.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  6. #16
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,984
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Frankly, had the term "cross walk" not been used in the story I would have been hard pressed to identify that as an actual cross walk versus assuming it was some sort of rainbow/pro-LGBTWMOUSE artwork on the road.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  7. #17
    OtterbatHellcat
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Central Arizona
    Posts
    21,941

    Default

    This state is so fucked.

    Yes.


    rainbow/pro-LGBTWMOUSE artwork on the road.

    Yes.


    ΜΟΛ
    ΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    My Feedback

  8. #18
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Denver....what a shithole.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  9. #19
    Grand Master Know It All 68Charger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, TX
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Is it possible that the paint they used is more slippery than the pavement, resulting in the skid marks directly?

    Oh, the irony.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...

  10. #20
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,961

    Default

    Is it illegal to leave skid marks?

    Does denver make you pay to remove skid marks?

    If the answer is no to both of these, let's go make skid marks here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •