http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-ammo-ban.html
The biggest part of this is they ruled that the 2nd Amendment does cover magazines. With that we need to let Trump put a person or two more on the Supreme Court then get our mag ban before them.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-ammo-ban.html
The biggest part of this is they ruled that the 2nd Amendment does cover magazines. With that we need to let Trump put a person or two more on the Supreme Court then get our mag ban before them.
If you want peace, prepare for war.
I'm hopeful, but not holding my breath.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
Definitely helps the Boulder case. Good news from a court that has been historically against us.
Isn’t the CO mag ban challenge still in progress? Any updates?
Even a blind hog finds a root once in a while...
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
The 4th ruled in Kolbe v Hogan that Heller protected "assault weapons" and "high capacity magazines" yet still found a way to allow Maryland's ban to be upheld.
Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est
Sane person with a better sight picture
Dead as of 2016, when the 10th Circuit ruled against the Sherriffs, claiming they didn't have standing.
http://coloradoguncase.org/
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
What the heck happened to the Ninth? They made ANOTHER correct Second opinion? https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...e-shaking-head
(TL;DR version: Open Carry is a protected activity)