Close
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    N.W. Denver
    Posts
    1,416
    If you want peace, prepare for war.

  2. #2
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I don't see how that's following Boulder's lead. The city of Thornton and Westminster, and most other cities have that same ban already I believe. At the very least, I can name a few specific parks and city owned buildings that have signs saying no open carry of firearms. I thought that was pretty standard practice.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  3. #3
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I thought that was pretty standard practice.
    It is.

    I know Arvada has it, as well as most urban counties. Ever looked at a Jeffco Open Space Regulations sign- Yup, no open carry.

    That is the Colorado Bugaboo with regards to open carry. Outside of Denver, it may not be "illegal" per say, but the minute you walk off a sidewalk and onto a green belt bike path, you are now breaking the law.

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner mattiooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Erie
    Posts
    1,308

    Default

    I don't open carry for very specific reasons, so this won't affect me personally, but I thought towns couldn't make laws that were in contradiction to state law and Erie is not a home rule municipality.

    My Feedback

    Ultima Ratio Regum - the final argument of kings.



  5. #5
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm under the impression it's not against the law because they are only banning open carry on property that they control.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  6. #6
    Nerdy Mod
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I'm under the impression it's not against the law because they are only banning open carry on property that they control.
    Yhea, it's only against the Colorado Constitution:

    Section 13. Right to bear arms. The right of no person to keep and bear
    arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power
    when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question; but nothing herein
    contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.

    Note that "unconcealed weapons" (open carry) CANNOT be "called into question."

    O2
    YOU are the first responder. Police, fire and medical are SECOND responders.
    When seconds count, the police are mere minutes away...
    Gun registration is gun confiscation in slow motion.

    My feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/53226-O2HeN2

  7. #7
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Erie
    Posts
    136

    Default

    I'm really wondering what this is in response to other than the new residents complaining about icky guns. I've been in this area for a few years now and haven't seen anyone open carry. Although, there was a slate of liberals/progressives voted into office because of O&G activity in the area so they may just be continuing on in the 'progressive' line of thought. They've already jacked up my taxes so I guess icky guns are next. With all of the development going on I really doubt that the gun range has much time before being pushed out too.

    ETA, with all of the coyotes in the area the trails are where you would need some form of defense.
    Last edited by avandelay; 07-25-2018 at 18:21.

  8. #8
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Erie already lost the Mile High Shooting Park, which was a mile or so east of the airpark along Hwy 7.

  9. #9
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    N.W. Denver
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
    Erie already lost the Mile High Shooting Park, which was a mile or so east of the airpark along Hwy 7.
    They didn't just lose it...it was stolen from the owners under the guise that the local police needed it for training. Not long there after it was shut down to make housing.
    If you want peace, prepare for war.

  10. #10
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Erie
    Posts
    136

    Default

    As I expected, this is a solution in search of a problem. Starting at minute 36 of this vid they start discussing the ordinance - http://erie.granicus.com/MediaPlayer...9&clip_id=1906. They have absolutely nothing to base the 'need' on and the example the police chief gives wouldn't even change if the ordinance was implemented.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •