Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner DenverGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Anna Tx
    Posts
    1,541

    Default New rifle design from Colorado Springs

    https://gazette.com/military/army-mi...767a4.amp.html

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5bad3973dde64.image.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	25.6 KB 
ID:	76245

    four 6 mm barrels cut side by side within one steel block. New ammunition blocks fired by electromagnetic actuators that could theoretically give the weapon a firing rate of 250 rounds per second.


    And then there’s the feature no soldier would turn down. “It’s called a power shot,” Grier said.


    That’s the shotgun feature of this sniper-shot, machine-assault gun that can send four bullets simultaneously whizzing toward an enemy at more than 2,500 mph.

  2. #2
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colo. Springs
    Posts
    970

    Default

    The article said the army ordered a military version for testing. Should be interesting to see if anything comes of it. Lots of fire volume promised. I wonder what how controllable it is to keep rounds on target.
    Last edited by 10x; 10-01-2018 at 09:06.

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tulsa
    Posts
    2,288

    Default

    Retarded, a rehash of metal storm. While you could find advantage in the multibarrel, those blocks of ammo look huge and can't have that high capacity, either the single block or a few stacked behind each other and ejected.

  4. #4
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,930

    Default

    I'd rather see the money spent on a mini gun for a drone. Kind of like a small A-10. Do you really need an anti-tank missile to kill a guy doing a goat?

  5. #5
    Viewer Discretion is Advised! UrbanWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Not Detriot yet, Ohio
    Posts
    1,696

    Default

    The picture in the article makes me thing the US military got scammed, but I shouldn't judge it by looks.
    Disclaimer: I can't spell.

  6. #6
    Splays for the Bidet CS1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    6,260

    Default

    Thing would need to be belt fed to be of any use. Aside from the multi-bore design, I only see this as upping the ante on failure points.

    The Army is either going to test this and say, "Thanks, but no thanks" or they are going to ask for changes that he balks at because this is his baby. Then, if the Army is still interested, they will ask for a few companies to test out the concepts they like that aren't patentable and this dude will be steamrolled by a large manufacturer because something like a multiple-bore system isn't exactly a new concept and he won't be able to fight it in court.
    Feedback

    It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton

  7. #7
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    I get pissed enough as it is when my cordless drill runs out of juice and no one's even shooting at me.

    No thanks.
    Always eat the vegans first

  8. #8
    Zombie Slayer kidicarus13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,275

    Default

    Metal Storm technology has been around for a while. The video was from 12 years ago...
    https://youtu.be/AEu9LLQpOF8
    Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets

  9. #9
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fitz19d View Post
    Retarded, a rehash of metal storm.
    That was the first thing that came to mind when I read it. Some ideas sound good on paper, but fall apart in the execution.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  10. #10
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SouthWest Denver
    Posts
    435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BushMasterBoy View Post
    I'd rather see the money spent on a mini gun for a drone. Kind of like a small A-10. Do you really need an anti-tank missile to kill a guy doing a goat?
    Like this?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiqeote2P2M

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •