I wasn't happy with my cheek weld either but I concluded that it was not height that I needed but width. So I tried the Magpul STR carbine stock recently which is wider than that Magpul MOE I was using.
 
			
			 
 
				I wasn't happy with my cheek weld either but I concluded that it was not height that I needed but width. So I tried the Magpul STR carbine stock recently which is wider than that Magpul MOE I was using.
Sayonara
 
 
				Anything lower than a 1.54” mount on an AR type rifle gets my neck so far out of whack I need to see a chiropractor. Currently I’m using a 1.93” height mount and it’s awesome, except when shooting prone, on which case it’s chin weld, although I can always add a cheek riser, but I can’t make the stock drop lower than the factory configuration regardless of what stock I’m using.
“For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;”
1 Timothy 2:5 
 
 
				Never did get a chance to check out what resulted with Tim K's low mount. But after all that consideration I grew tired of the situation with the what if's & waiting. Finally just went & bought a couch for my face. I don't even remember which, the sls maybe. Some improvement with weld position though it's ugly as sin. It'll have to do until it doesnt.
Thanks everyone. I very much appreciate the thoughts toward my query.
My airstream has been stolen by dopers
 
 
				Remember that the M-16 was originally designed with the carrying handle and high front sight post. As we have evolved to the AR-15, the height for optics is similar to that of the old carrying handle. Another problem with a low mount (when using a standard rifle scope) is that the charging handle is hard to access/function with a full size scope in the way.