Magazine Limit Court Challenge

[Will1776]

Why don’t people like Dudley Brown?

[crays]

..

[Zundfolge]

Why don’t people like Dudley Brown?

Oh boy ... ok. So most people see Dudley as more interested in promoting Dudley than in promoting the Second Amendment ... in fact the magazine ban and universal background check nonsense we're now living under is partially his fault as there was a good, solid Republican running for the State Senate (or was it the house?) in a close race that didn't bow, scrape and kiss Dudley's ring so he withheld his support causing the Democrats to win that seat and thus giving them the advantage they needed to immediately pass the gun control. Also Dudley is more interested in attacking the NRA and SAF and any other pro-gun activists that he sees as getting between him and a dollar.

If I've missed anything I'm sure others will fill in.

[roberth]

Zundfolge nailed it. Dudley is far more interested in separating us from our money than he is in protecting our natural rights. He's a con artist, liar, and general, all-around fuckstain.

[spqrzilla]

+1 for Zund's explanation.

[USMC88-93]

+1 for Zund.

[Mazin]

Zund nailed it perfectly.
Also you were not privy to the dudsters delightful insights here, yea he is a member here as well. Lets just say I can in full confidence say that very few (if any) long term members here support RMGO because of the Dudster, he goes that might change.

[Gman]

I made the mistake of throwing some money his way one year. That was a mistake that I never repeated.

[Will1776]

Zund nailed it perfectly.
Also you were not privy to the dudsters delightful insights here, yea he is a member here as well. Lets just say I can in full confidence say that very few (if any) long term members here support RMGO because of the Dudster, he goes that might change.

Thanks for the explanation Zund. I guess I won’t be renewing my membership next year. I also heard he was against a compromise that would raise the limit to 30.

[Zundfolge]

I also heard he was against a compromise that would raise the limit to 30.

Yes, but to be fair, as much as it pains me, I was kinda in agreement with him there because I figured if we just raised the limit we'd never get rid of the idea of a mag ban and never get rid of the Universal Background Checks (which is eve more egregious if you ask me) ... that said in retrospect the compromise would probably have been a more good thing than bad because frankly after this next election I don't think Colorado comes back to the reddish purple it used to be and will slide into the sea with CA before we see another Republican governor and if we lose the Senate we'll never get it back (and we're certainly not getting rid of the mag ban or UBCs unless the courts step in).