I don't know what Duds is going for here or if it will even help. Seems to be a peripheral challenge that can quickly be remedied by changing the law.

I am ready to donate for a challenge to the core of the mag ban problem; banning components of firearms in common use is the same as banning the firearm. Limiting the capacity from common use is arbitrary and violates 100 years of 2A precedent.

Banning features (CA, NY) of firearms in common use is the same thing.

If an American can't own a firearm in common use, and functioning at that level, there is no 2A.

If they want to keep a box drawn around dangerous and unusual, as Scalia noted in Heller, I'm not okay with it but can live with it.

I think such a challenge could get support from gun owners in multiple states although we only need one group of plaintiffs. If the NRA doesn't pick this up with Kavanaugh seated, I think they're going to have issues keeping members.