Close
Results 1 to 10 of 65

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 10-07-2018, 22:20 #8
    Rucker61
    Rucker61 is offline
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    I don't know what Duds is going for here or if it will even help. Seems to be a peripheral challenge that can quickly be remedied by changing the law.

    I am ready to donate for a challenge to the core of the mag ban problem; banning components of firearms in common use is the same as banning the firearm. Limiting the capacity from common use is arbitrary and violates 100 years of 2A precedent.

    Banning features (CA, NY) of firearms in common use is the same thing.

    If an American can't own a firearm in common use, and functioning at that level, there is no 2A.

    If they want to keep a box drawn around dangerous and unusual, as Scalia noted in Heller, I'm not okay with it but can live with it.
    According to Caetano, no firearm currently sold to US citizens outside of NFA 1934 is both dangerous and unusual.
    Last edited by Rucker61; 10-07-2018 at 22:34.
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules