Magazine Limit Court Challenge

[Grant H.]

Maybe an unenforced 15 round limit is better than an enforced 30 round limit

Except for what Zund is alluding to with the upcoming election.

If things don't go the way we want here in Nov, which is VERY likely, we could have an enforced 15rd limit.

[Zundfolge]

Except for what Zund is alluding to with the upcoming election.

If things don't go the way we want here in Nov, which is VERY likely, we could have an enforced 15rd limit.

And the other argument is that if we agree that the argument is just about the number of rounds limited, the 15rd limit turned 30 could easily be changed a 10 or 5 rd limit.

[Skip]

And the other argument is that if we agree that the argument is just about the number of rounds limited, the 15rd limit turned 30 could easily be changed a 10 or 5 rd limit.

Which wouldn't have limited our legal options one bit when they inevitably broke their word.

30 would have put the ban outside of common use as 30 rounders are common use for the AR/AK platforms giving us less standing. Would have been harder to challenge that. If the debate was between 30 and unlimited it was foolish to let 15 win.

I think the answer is going to come out of CA or NY and should apply to all states. NYSafe was already ruled an arbitrary ban at 7 rounds. It's 10 now but no less arbitrary, just what some judge thought was reasonable. No modern pistol/rifle, as issued, has such a limit that I know of (maybe .50BMG and shotguns).