As shitty as this sounds, the only solution I see is to acknowledge BigTech succeeded in moving the marketplace of ideas to cyberspace and treat these socials like a utility which includes end-to-end access from posting to unrestricted audience.
And that is exactly what is being explored right now hence the Congressional hearings.
If the socials are peer-to-peer communication networks then this makes sense as they are communication facilitators. If the socials are content owners (which is what they claim by ToS) then they have a big problem because (like you said) they have to own the illicit content they allow. They have also acted (together) to maintain a monopoly on social media communication even collaborating their political attacks together.






Reply With Quote
