Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
The official story so far is that her parents reported her missing and the FL cops found her website and alerted the FBI who them found out she had already flown to CO and bought a shotgun legally. It sounds like she used a ride sharing service to the foothills. Let’s not get carried away with all of the false flag /red flag talk and focus on the fact that one 18 girl with a shotgun has managed to shut down the entire front range. That’s the real story. Lot of conspiracy BS when the truth is the Dems won’t let a tragedy go to waste. Let’s hype up the whole state
So to sum up, an 18 year old who as near as we can tell, has not committed any crime, has paralyzed the city with fear?
Martin
If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.
Observation 1) There has never been any threat by the girl or there would be PC to arrest. Threatening that kind of action, is an offense that gives PC to arrest. As is even threatening to harm one person.
Observation 2) It's kind of unusual to call the parents and have an "FBI Investigator" answer the parents phone, respond to the media, and claim to be questioning the parents.
To the extent this is real, it's boiled down to:
1. 18 yo girl might have expressed interest in Columbine (but has apparently never threatened to do a repeat, which would be PC)
2. 18yo girl might have traveled to Colorado and might have bought a shotgun.
Meanwhile, all of the front range panics like an ICBM is incoming, shutters all the schools, etc.
I wonder to what extent this is actually an NSA case -- you know, how they give "tips" to local law enforcement based on all the surveillance of US Citizens that they don't do, giving LE a heads up to invent PC to arrest someone the NSA feels is dangerous, but yet, can't be based upon what the NSA actually intercepted because that would be, illegal to spy on it's own citizens without PC.
To determine *what* someone bought would require talking to the people who sold it (Gunstore or private party who didn't do a FFL like they should). But, in theory (if we ignore legal standards for a moment), CBI could be able to say "xxx attempted to buy a gun two days ago at "store", and it was a long gun, and the background check was rejected/successful". Now, whether or not they should is another argument entirely, that's the extent of the data the gov't immediately has access to (e.g., CBI would not be able to say "it's a pump shotgun", because they don't have a clue.) Now, the only way electronic intercepts would put it together is if she bought it online in advance of coming to CO, or the most likely of all is if they looked at her card statements, saw a gun store, and went in and talked to them or something.
ETA: What I'm most suspicious of is she may have made credible threats online, in a way the gov't shouldn't have been able to associate with her real identity, so the gov't isn't in a position to explain that she made these threats, because it would beg the question how they know it was her.
ETA 2: And of course, the other possibility is that it is just the parents saying "Our daughter is interested in Columbine and went to CO" but then, the response would be incredibly and unjustifiably overblown.
Last edited by FoxtArt; 04-17-2019 at 09:48.
A quick call to CBI to see if anyone by the name of < insert name here > has
had a background check done in the last week and if so where was it (or more) done.
Send investigators to that location(s), copy the 4473(s), interview the seller(s) and review security footage.