Was that from the engine or was that just another part of the system venting?
I assume the engine firing is the one with all of the white smoke.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
The flame from the engine becomes almost invisible. The spray below the engine is water.
Someone else asked the same question over on Twitter. This was the response;
But it appears this is the correct answer;First firing vaporizes some of the copper liner. Copper causes the green flame.
But in this case, it’s the ignition fluid, TEA-TEB
Last edited by Gman; 06-20-2019 at 13:47.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
India just launched a mission that will put a vehicle in orbit around the moon, and a lander/rover combination on the south polar lunar surface.
https://spacenews.com/india-launches...ander-mission/
Super exciting.
Hausj?rvi, FINLAND — India successfully launched its Chandrayaan-2 orbiter and lunar surface spacecraft Monday, a week after the first launch attempt was scrubbed due to an issue with the launch vehicle.
A GSLV Mk 3 aunch vehicle lifted off from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota off the coast of the Bay of Bengal at 5:13 a.m. Eastern, with the event webcast live by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO).
The mission aims to place an orbiter in a 100- by 100-kilometer lunar polar orbit and carry out a soft landing near the south pole of the moon with a lander and rover. A successful touchdown would make India the fourth country to achieve a lunar landing after the U.S., the former Soviet Union and China.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
Looks like NASA is looking to throw some cash at three companies to get development of a lunar lander underway.
https://spacenews.com/nasa-outlines-...-partnerships/
WASHINGTON — As NASA celebrated the 50th anniversary of the first crewed landing on the moon, the agency released new details about how it will procure landers to enable humans to return to the moon in the 2020s.
NASA released July 19 a presolicitation notice for its Human Landing System Integrated Lander effort, part of the Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships (NextSTEP) program. The notice included a draft version of a broad agency announcement, with NASA requesting industry comments on it by Aug. 2.
The draft solicitation offers some new details on NASA’s approach to developing landers capable of carrying humans to the surface of the moon and back, and do so in time to meet the 2024 established by the White House earlier this year and reaffirmed by Vice President Mike Pence in a July 20 speech marking the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
Putting a manned lunar rover on the moon is sooo 1970s...
Seriously, though... Is the (fairly) recent uptick in interest by various countries in launching moon missions fueled by the same reasons we did it in the 60s and 70s?
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
I would say that current lunar missions are largely driven by national desires for prestige, at least primarily for the non-American nations, e.g. China, India, and Israel. The two Chinese lunar rover missions were explicitly designed as part of an overall architecture with an eye to conducting unmanned sample return missions followed by manned lunar exploration.
However, there's still plenty of science to be done on the lunar surface, not the least of which would involve prospecting for in-situ resource utilization.
Ultimately, though, I think there are additional plans above and beyond what was accomplished with Apollo, not the least of which would be to set up permanent manned facilities to conduct additional research and experimentation. Being able to conduct off-world testing on the moon is seen as a stepping stone to eventual plans for exploring Mars.
Finally, there also seem to be a number of private corporations looking to hitch rides to the moon in order to explore possible business use cases.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
I can think of a number of better ways to spend 20 billion dollars!
Rich
$20B is enough to run the entire US government...for about 4 hours and 42 minutes.
Last edited by TFOGGER; 07-22-2019 at 15:39.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?